Model comparison

Falcon-180B vs Muse Spark 1.3

Muse Spark 1.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark 1.3 Meta

54.8

Rank #27 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark 1.3 in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Muse Spark 1.3 leads 73.6 to 29.1.
  • Falcon-180B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Falcon-180B and Muse Spark 1.3 specifications
Falcon-180BMuse Spark 1.3
ProviderTechnology Innovation InstituteMeta
Noometry Index32.254.8
Released2023-09-062026-09-02
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.25
Output $ / M tokens—$4.25
Results tracked1637

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Muse Spark 1.3: 56.6 (#21)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BMuse Spark 1.3
CursorBench—41.6%
LMArena WebDev—1657
SciCode—59.7%
LMArena Coding—1514

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Muse Spark 1.3: 38.6 (#30)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BMuse Spark 1.3
APEX-Agents—57.8%
GDP.pdf—27.6%

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), Muse Spark 1.3: 54.0 (#27)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Hard Prompts10071503
Epoch Capabilities Index112.13156.75
NYT Connections (extended)—85.1%
CritPt—26%
Chess Puzzles—38%
Mystery Game Puzzles—25%
DTBench—96.5%
LMCA—53.9%
Bench to the Future 3—0.14
HellaSwag89%—
LAMBADA79.8%—
PIQA84.9%—
WinoGrande87.1%—

Math Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Muse Spark 1.3: 73.1 (#21)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BMuse Spark 1.3
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—74.4%
FrontierMath Tier 4—46.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—99.2%
ProofBench—58%
LMArena Math—1494
GSM8K54.4%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Muse Spark 1.3: 42.6 (#95)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Expert—1516
ARC (AI2) Challenge67.8%—
BoolQ89%—
MMLU70.6%—
OpenBookQA64.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Muse Spark 1.3: 43.7 (#22)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Vision—1309
LMArena Document—1471

Multilingual Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), Muse Spark 1.3: 57.4 (#8)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Non-English10001481
LMArena Chinese—1529
LMArena French—1524
LMArena German—1515
LMArena Japanese—1474
LMArena Korean—1501
LMArena Russian—1490
LMArena Spanish—1490

Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), Muse Spark 1.3: 77.5 (#22)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Instruction Following10471477

Long Context Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Muse Spark 1.3: 45.6 (#32)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Longer Query—1488

Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), Muse Spark 1.3: 73.6 (#9)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text10541490
LMArena Creative Writing10891455
LMArena Multi-Turn10131482
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1906

Frequently asked questions

Is Falcon-180B better than Muse Spark 1.3?

Muse Spark 1.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Muse Spark 1.3 share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.3 has 37.

Related comparisons

Go deeper