Model comparison
Falcon 2 11B vs GPT-5.2 Pro
GPT-5.2 Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#39); Falcon 2 11B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Technology Innovation InstituteSummary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both.
- Falcon 2 11B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Falcon 2 11B | GPT-5.2 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | — | 52.3 |
| Released | 2024-05-09 | 2025-12-11 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 400K |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $21 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $168 |
| Results tracked | 5 | 8 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Reasoning Not comparable
Falcon 2 11B: —, GPT-5.2 Pro: 51.5 (#33)
| Benchmark | Falcon 2 11B | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 109.56 | 155.4 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 54.2% |
| SimpleBench | — | 57.4% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 79.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 90.5% |
| HellaSwag | 82.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 78.3% | — |
Math Not comparable
Falcon 2 11B: —, GPT-5.2 Pro: 65.3 (#29)
| Benchmark | Falcon 2 11B | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 74% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 46% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 31.3% |
| GSM8K | 53.8% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Falcon 2 11B: —, GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Falcon 2 11B | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 58.4% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Falcon 2 11B better than GPT-5.2 Pro?
GPT-5.2 Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#39); Falcon 2 11B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Falcon 2 11B and GPT-5.2 Pro share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Falcon 2 11B has 5 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.2 Pro has 8.