Model comparison

Falcon-40B vs GPT-5.5

GPT-5.5 has enough public results to be ranked (#9); Falcon-40B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both.
  • Falcon-40B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Falcon-40B and GPT-5.5 specifications
Falcon-40BGPT-5.5
ProviderTechnology Innovation InstituteOpenAI
Noometry Index—63.4
Released2023-03-152026-04-23
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—128K
Input $ / M tokens—$5
Output $ / M tokens—$30
Results tracked1271

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Falcon-40B: —, GPT-5.5: 58.2 (#17)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-40BGPT-5.5
SWE-bench Verified—80.6%
DeepSWE—67%
FrontierCode—43%
LMArena WebDev—1513
SciCode—56.1%
GSO—40.2%
WeirdML—84.9%
LMArena Coding—1494
MirrorCode—10%
ALE-Bench—1,943

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Falcon-40B: —, GPT-5.5: 50.7 (#6)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-40BGPT-5.5
Terminal-Bench—84.7%
APEX-Agents—55.1%
OSWorld 2.0—13%
Remote Labor Index—6.3%
τ²-bench Banking—44.6%
DeepResearch Bench—54%
PostTrainBench—27.2%
ExploitBench—47.4%
GBAEval—53.2%
GDP.pdf—26%
LMArena Search—1242
Vending-Bench 2—7,524

Reasoning Not comparable

Falcon-40B: —, GPT-5.5: 72.8 (#11)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-40BGPT-5.5
Epoch Capabilities Index104.45159.1
ARC-AGI-2—85%
SimpleBench—69%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—88.8%
NYT Connections (extended)—96.2%
ARC-AGI-1—95%
CritPt—27.1%
Chess Puzzles—54%
EBR-Bench—34.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1489
Mystery Game Puzzles—56%
DTBench—96%
LMCA—54.3%
Surface Evolver Bench—88.1%
Bench to the Future 3—0.14
BIG-Bench Hard37.1%—
ForecastBench—60.6
HellaSwag85.3%—
LAMBADA77.3%—
PIQA83%—
WinoGrande76.9%—

Math Not comparable

Falcon-40B: —, GPT-5.5: 81.7 (#11)

Knowledge Not comparable

Falcon-40B: —, GPT-5.5: 64.4 (#17)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-40BGPT-5.5
GPQA Diamond—94%
SimpleQA Verified—63%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—9.3%
LMArena Expert—1508
ARC (AI2) Challenge61.9%—
BoolQ83.1%—
MMLU56.9%—
OpenBookQA56.6%—
TriviaQA79.9%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Falcon-40B: —, GPT-5.5: 46.9 (#12)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-40BGPT-5.5
LMArena Vision—1297
Blueprint-Bench 2—36.2%
Furniture Assembly—44.2%
LMArena Document—1486

Multilingual Not comparable

Falcon-40B: —, GPT-5.5: 56.4 (#20)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-40BGPT-5.5
LMArena Non-English—1467
LMArena Chinese—1533
LMArena French—1486
LMArena German—1480
LMArena Japanese—1498
LMArena Korean—1460
LMArena Russian—1473
LMArena Spanish—1468

Instruction Following Not comparable

Falcon-40B: —, GPT-5.5: 77.5 (#18)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-40BGPT-5.5
LMArena Instruction Following—1479

Long Context Not comparable

Falcon-40B: —, GPT-5.5: 48.3 (#12)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-40BGPT-5.5
CL-bench Life—22.2%
LMArena Longer Query—1484

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Falcon-40B: —, GPT-5.5: 72.7 (#13)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-40BGPT-5.5
LMArena Text—1472
LMArena Creative Writing—1455
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1844
EQ-Bench 4—1315
LMArena Multi-Turn—1476

Frequently asked questions

Is Falcon-40B better than GPT-5.5?

GPT-5.5 has enough public results to be ranked (#9); Falcon-40B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Falcon-40B and GPT-5.5 share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Falcon-40B has 12 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.5 has 71.

Related comparisons

Go deeper