Model comparison

Falcon-7B vs GPT-5.6 Sol

GPT-5.6 Sol has enough public results to be ranked (#7); Falcon-7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified October 10, 2026. 1 shared benchmarks.

Falcon-7B

Technology Innovation Institute

—

Unranked

GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI

65.0

Rank #7 Confirmed

Summary

They share 1 benchmark with published results for both.
Falcon-7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Falcon-7B and GPT-5.6 Sol specifications
	Falcon-7B	GPT-5.6 Sol
Provider	Technology Innovation Institute	OpenAI
Noometry Index	—	65.0
Released	2023-04-24	2026-07-09
Weights	Open	Proprietary
Context window	—	1.05M
Max output	—	128K
Input $ / M tokens	—	$4
Output $ / M tokens	—	$20
Results tracked	12	65

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Falcon-7B: —, GPT-5.6 Sol: 65.1 (#7)

Coding benchmarks
Benchmark	Falcon-7B	GPT-5.6 Sol
DeepSWE	—	72.7%
FrontierCode	—	47.5%
CursorBench	—	41.7%
LMArena WebDev	—	1618
FrontierSWE	—	32.2%
SciCode	—	57.1%
GSO	—	76.5%
WeirdML	—	89.4%
LMArena Coding	—	1498
MirrorCode	—	20%
ALE-Bench	—	2,177

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Falcon-7B: —, GPT-5.6 Sol: 50.3 (#7)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
Benchmark	Falcon-7B	GPT-5.6 Sol
APEX-Agents	—	51.4%
OSWorld 2.0	—	27.3%
τ²-bench Banking	—	46.9%
PostTrainBench	—	36.2%
BALROG	—	60%
GBAEval	—	52.6%
GDP.pdf	—	30.7%
LMArena Search	—	1257
Vending-Bench 2	—	9,619

Reasoning Not comparable

Falcon-7B: —, GPT-5.6 Sol: 74.8 (#8)

Reasoning benchmarks
Benchmark	Falcon-7B	GPT-5.6 Sol
Epoch Capabilities Index	95.1	161.66
ARC-AGI-2	—	92.5%
SimpleBench	—	71.7%
Kagi LLM Benchmark	—	67%
NYT Connections (extended)	—	93.8%
ARC-AGI-1	—	97.5%
CritPt	—	32.3%
Chess Puzzles	—	64%
EnigmaEval	—	37.1%
EBR-Bench	—	44.8%
LMArena Hard Prompts	—	1484
Mystery Game Puzzles	—	58%
DTBench	—	96%
LMCA	—	59.2%
Surface Evolver Bench	—	93.1%
Bench to the Future 3	—	0.14
BIG-Bench Hard	28.8%	—
HellaSwag	78.1%	—
LAMBADA	74.9%	—
PIQA	80.3%	—
WinoGrande	67.2%	—

Math Not comparable

Falcon-7B: —, GPT-5.6 Sol: 85.6 (#9)

Math benchmarks
Benchmark	Falcon-7B	GPT-5.6 Sol
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)	—	89.1%
FrontierMath Tier 4	—	82.9%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025	—	100%
ProofBench	—	83%
LMArena Math	—	1474
FrontierMath Erdős	—	0%
GSM8K	6.8%	—

Knowledge Not comparable

Falcon-7B: —, GPT-5.6 Sol: 64.3 (#18)

Knowledge benchmarks
Benchmark	Falcon-7B	GPT-5.6 Sol
GPQA Diamond	—	93.5%
SimpleQA Verified	—	69.7%
Vectara Hallucination Rate	—	12.4%
LMArena Expert	—	1516
ARC (AI2) Challenge	47.9%	—
BoolQ	75.3%	—
MMLU	35%	—
OpenBookQA	51.6%	—
TriviaQA	64.6%	—

Multimodal Not comparable

Falcon-7B: —, GPT-5.6 Sol: 48.6 (#9)

Multimodal benchmarks
Benchmark	Falcon-7B	GPT-5.6 Sol
LMArena Vision	—	1281
Blueprint-Bench 2	—	33.6%
Furniture Assembly	—	56.7%
LMArena Document	—	1483

Multilingual Not comparable

Falcon-7B: —, GPT-5.6 Sol: 55.3 (#32)

Multilingual benchmarks
Benchmark	Falcon-7B	GPT-5.6 Sol
LMArena Non-English	—	1452
LMArena Chinese	—	1527
LMArena French	—	1477
LMArena German	—	1476
LMArena Japanese	—	1471
LMArena Korean	—	1442
LMArena Russian	—	1468
LMArena Spanish	—	1441

Instruction Following Not comparable

Falcon-7B: —, GPT-5.6 Sol: 77.7 (#16)

Instruction Following benchmarks
Benchmark	Falcon-7B	GPT-5.6 Sol
LMArena Instruction Following	—	1482

Long Context Not comparable

Falcon-7B: —, GPT-5.6 Sol: 45.4 (#42)

Long Context benchmarks
Benchmark	Falcon-7B	GPT-5.6 Sol
LMArena Longer Query	—	1480

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Falcon-7B: —, GPT-5.6 Sol: 73.3 (#12)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
Benchmark	Falcon-7B	GPT-5.6 Sol
LMArena Text	—	1457
LMArena Creative Writing	—	1448
EQ-Bench Creative Writing	—	1972
EQ-Bench 4	—	1250
LMArena Multi-Turn	—	1460

Frequently asked questions

Is Falcon-7B better than GPT-5.6 Sol?