Model comparison

Falcon-7B vs Qwen3.8 Max

Qwen3.8 Max has enough public results to be ranked (#22); Falcon-7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both.
  • Falcon-7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Falcon-7B and Qwen3.8 Max specifications
Falcon-7BQwen3.8 Max
ProviderTechnology Innovation InstituteAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index—56.8
Released2023-04-242026-08-02
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked1239

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Falcon-7B: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 53.5 (#29)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-7BQwen3.8 Max
DeepSWE—57.5%
LMArena WebDev—1674
FrontierSWE—17.8%
SciCode—53.2%
LMArena Coding—1502

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Falcon-7B: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 45.4 (#14)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-7BQwen3.8 Max
APEX-Agents—63.3%
τ²-bench Banking—55.1%
GDP.pdf—23.2%

Reasoning Not comparable

Falcon-7B: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 54.4 (#26)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-7BQwen3.8 Max
Epoch Capabilities Index95.1156.41
NYT Connections (extended)—88.3%
CritPt—20%
Chess Puzzles—40%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1496
Mystery Game Puzzles—38%
DTBench—92%
LMCA—46.2%
BIG-Bench Hard28.8%—
HellaSwag78.1%—
LAMBADA74.9%—
PIQA80.3%—
WinoGrande67.2%—

Math Not comparable

Falcon-7B: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 73.2 (#20)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-7BQwen3.8 Max
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—74.7%
FrontierMath Tier 4—46.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—100%
ProofBench—58%
LMArena Math—1499
GSM8K6.8%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Falcon-7B: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 61.7 (#27)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-7BQwen3.8 Max
GPQA Diamond—92.7%
SimpleQA Verified—47.3%
LMArena Expert—1507
ARC (AI2) Challenge47.9%—
BoolQ75.3%—
MMLU35%—
OpenBookQA51.6%—
TriviaQA64.6%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Falcon-7B: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 37.2 (#75)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-7BQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Vision—1314
Furniture Assembly—20%

Multilingual Not comparable

Falcon-7B: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 56.7 (#18)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-7BQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Non-English—1472
LMArena Chinese—1538
LMArena French—1503
LMArena German—1483
LMArena Japanese—1467
LMArena Korean—1461
LMArena Russian—1481
LMArena Spanish—1492

Instruction Following Not comparable

Falcon-7B: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 77.6 (#17)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-7BQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Instruction Following—1479

Long Context Not comparable

Falcon-7B: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 45.6 (#31)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-7BQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Longer Query—1489

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Falcon-7B: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 67.1 (#30)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-7BQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Text—1483
LMArena Creative Writing—1479
LMArena Multi-Turn—1489

Frequently asked questions

Is Falcon-7B better than Qwen3.8 Max?

Qwen3.8 Max has enough public results to be ranked (#22); Falcon-7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Falcon-7B and Qwen3.8 Max share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Falcon-7B has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.8 Max has 39.

Related comparisons

Go deeper