Model comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Gemini 2.0 Pro
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 1 category and Gemini 2.0 Pro in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 39.7 to 9.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 11.2% for Gemini 1.0 Pro and 83.5% for Gemini 2.0 Pro.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemini 2.0 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Noometry Index | 27.3 | 39.1 |
| Released | 2023-12-13 | 2025-02-05 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | — | 35.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 63.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |
Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 117.04 | 135.06 |
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.7% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 60.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | — |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 68% |
| LiveBench | — | 65.1% |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | 83.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 71% |
| LMArena Math | 1132 | — |
Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | 65.7% |
| Confabulations | — | 18.4% |
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | — |
| MMLU | 70% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252), Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | — |
| LMArena French | 1145 | — |
| LMArena German | 1125 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1119 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 83.4% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | — |
Long Context Gemini 1.0 Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 41.7% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | — |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1131 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 44.9% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Gemini 2.0 Pro?
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Gemini 2.0 Pro better for coding?
Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Gemini 2.0 Pro share?
3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14.