Model comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Gemini 4 Argon
Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Gemini 4 Argon in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 4 Argon leads 73.9 to 9.3.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemini 4 Argon | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Noometry Index | 27.3 | 56.5 |
| Released | 2023-12-13 | 2026-09-30 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275), Gemini 4 Argon: 62.0 (#9)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1550 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1678 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 55% |
| SciCode | — | 61.8% |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: —, Gemini 4 Argon: 49.2 (#8)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 82.2% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 13,718 |
Reasoning Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296), Gemini 4 Argon: 44.2 (#47)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1548 |
| CritPt | — | 27.1% |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 117.04 | — |
Math Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321), Gemini 4 Argon: 73.9 (#17)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1536 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 99% |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291), Gemini 4 Argon: 43.9 (#89)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1553 |
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | — |
| MMLU | 70% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: —, Gemini 4 Argon: 46.5 (#14)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 54.4% |
Multilingual Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252), Gemini 4 Argon: 60.3 (#1)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1523 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1610 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1537 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1119 | 1497 |
| LMArena French | 1145 | — |
| LMArena German | 1125 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267), Gemini 4 Argon: 80.1 (#2)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1538 |
Long Context Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249), Gemini 4 Argon: 47.6 (#15)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1549 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264), Gemini 4 Argon: 71.4 (#19)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1534 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1131 | 1531 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1557 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Gemini 4 Argon?
Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Gemini 4 Argon better for coding?
Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on coding benchmarks: 62.0 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Gemini 4 Argon share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 4 Argon has 21.