Model comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs GLM-4.7-Flash
GLM-4.7-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.4 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-4.7-Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GLM-4.7-Flash leads 34.4 to 8.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.1% for Gemini 1.0 Pro and 58.3% for GLM-4.7-Flash.
- GLM-4.7-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.0 Pro | GLM-4.7-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | |
| Noometry Index | 27.1 | 38.4 |
| Released | 2023-12-13 | 2026-01-19 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 200K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.06 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Results tracked | 24 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-4.7-Flash leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 31.6 (#270), GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.0 (#133)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1383 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |
Reasoning GLM-4.7-Flash leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 16.4 (#292), GLM-4.7-Flash: 20.2 (#224)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1356 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.97 | — |
Math GLM-4.7-Flash leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 8.7 (#315), GLM-4.7-Flash: 34.4 (#159)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | 58.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1354 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |
Knowledge GLM-4.7-Flash leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.5 (#286), GLM-4.7-Flash: 35.4 (#177)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | 60.5% |
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1357 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 9.3% |
| MMLU | 70% | — |
Multilingual GLM-4.7-Flash leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.5 (#247), GLM-4.7-Flash: 46.8 (#152)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1331 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1403 |
| LMArena French | 1144 | 1332 |
| LMArena German | 1125 | 1336 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1333 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1118 | 1351 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | — |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1284 |
Instruction Following GLM-4.7-Flash leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.9 (#262), GLM-4.7-Flash: 70.3 (#162)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1327 |
Long Context GLM-4.7-Flash leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#244), GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.9 (#143)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1345 |
Writing & Preference GLM-4.7-Flash leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.2 (#259), GLM-4.7-Flash: 47.7 (#206)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1351 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1130 | 1297 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1342 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1125 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than GLM-4.7-Flash?
GLM-4.7-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.4 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or GLM-4.7-Flash better for coding?
GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 31.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and GLM-4.7-Flash share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.7-Flash has 21.