Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 1.0 Pro vs GPT-4.1

GPT-4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.7 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 21 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 1.0 Pro Google

27.1

Rank #327 Confirmed

GPT-4.1 OpenAI

35.7

Rank #215 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 1 category and GPT-4.1 in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GPT-4.1 leads 57.8 to 36.2.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 11.2% for Gemini 1.0 Pro and 83% for GPT-4.1.

Side by side

Gemini 1.0 ProGPT-4.1
ProviderGoogleOpenAI
Noometry Index27.135.7
Released2023-12-132025-04-14
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—33K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$8
Results tracked2452

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-4.1 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 31.6 (#270), GPT-4.1: 34.2 (#228)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGPT-4.1
LMArena Coding11081391
SWE-bench Verified—48.5%
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—39.6%
Aider Polyglot—52.4%
WeirdML—39%
CadEval—42%
ALE-Bench—558.1
HumanEval+55.5%—
MBPP+61.4%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 1.0 Pro: —, GPT-4.1: 34.4 (#40)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGPT-4.1
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—54%

Reasoning Gemini 1.0 Pro leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 16.4 (#292), GPT-4.1: 11.7 (#334)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGPT-4.1
LMArena Hard Prompts11091384
DTBench45.9%68.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index116.97136.79
ARC-AGI-2—0.4%
SimpleBench—27%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—52.3%
ARC-AGI-1—5.5%
Chess Puzzles—6%
EnigmaEval—2.2%
LMCA—25.6%
ForecastBench—61.5

Math GPT-4.1 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 8.7 (#315), GPT-4.1: 21.4 (#269)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGPT-4.1
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.1%38.3%
LMArena Math11321369
MATH Level 511.2%83%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—6%
Omni-MATH—47.1%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—5.5%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—0%

Knowledge GPT-4.1 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.5 (#286), GPT-4.1: 37.0 (#152)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGPT-4.1
GPQA Diamond34%66.9%
LMArena Expert10591364
Humanity's Last Exam—5.4%
SimpleQA Verified—31.1%
MMLU-Pro—81.1%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.6%
GPQA (HELM)—65.9%
MMLU70%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 1.0 Pro: —, GPT-4.1: 37.5 (#66)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGPT-4.1
LMArena Vision—1210
GeoBench—72%

Multilingual GPT-4.1 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.5 (#247), GPT-4.1: 49.6 (#128)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGPT-4.1
LMArena Non-English11381370
LMArena Chinese11241382
LMArena French11441383
LMArena German11251380
LMArena Japanese10231320
LMArena Russian11861377
LMArena Spanish11181375
LMArena Korean—1339

Instruction Following GPT-4.1 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.9 (#262), GPT-4.1: 71.5 (#148)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGPT-4.1
LMArena Instruction Following11141367
IFEval—83.8%

Long Context GPT-4.1 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#244), GPT-4.1: 40.0 (#158)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGPT-4.1
LMArena Longer Query11321385
Fiction.LiveBench—63.9%

Writing & Preference GPT-4.1 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.2 (#259), GPT-4.1: 57.8 (#120)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGPT-4.1
LMArena Text11491383
LMArena Creative Writing11301363
LMArena Multi-Turn11391398
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1420
WildBench—85.4%

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than GPT-4.1?

GPT-4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.7 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or GPT-4.1 better for coding?

GPT-4.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.2 versus 31.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and GPT-4.1 share?

21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and GPT-4.1 has 52.

Related comparisons

Go deeper