Model comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs GPT-4o
GPT-4o is the stronger model overall, scoring 28.5 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 24 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 24 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 2 categories and GPT-4o in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GPT-4o leads 52.8 to 36.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 11.2% for Gemini 1.0 Pro and 53.3% for GPT-4o.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.0 Pro | GPT-4o | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Noometry Index | 27.1 | 28.5 |
| Released | 2023-12-13 | 2024-05-13 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $10 |
| Results tracked | 24 | 72 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 1.0 Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 31.6 (#270), GPT-4o: 25.1 (#323)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GPT-4o |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1297 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | 87.2% |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | 72.2% |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 31% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 21.6% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 45.3% |
| GSO | — | 0% |
| WeirdML | — | 25.1% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 51.1% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 51.4% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 61.1% |
| CadEval | — | 26% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: —, GPT-4o: 20.8 (#133)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GPT-4o |
|---|---|---|
| GDPval | — | 9.9% |
| TheAgentCompany | — | 8.6% |
| Cybench | — | 12.5% |
| BALROG | — | 32.3% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1006 |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 40.8% |
Reasoning Gemini 1.0 Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 16.4 (#292), GPT-4o: 9.4 (#338)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GPT-4o |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1281 |
| DTBench | 45.9% | 64.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.97 | 128.97 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0% |
| SimpleBench | — | 17.8% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 4.5% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 13% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.8% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 55.8% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 60.9% |
| LMCA | — | 16.6% |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.7 |
| LiveBench | — | 55.3% |
Math GPT-4o leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 8.7 (#315), GPT-4o: 10.2 (#303)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GPT-4o |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | 6.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1285 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | 53.3% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 0.4% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 29.3% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 49.5% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 0.3% |
Knowledge GPT-4o leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.5 (#286), GPT-4o: 28.8 (#235)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GPT-4o |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | 49.2% |
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1250 |
| MMLU | 70% | 88.1% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 2.7% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 26% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 71.3% |
| Confabulations | — | 15.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 9.6% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 52% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: —, GPT-4o: 33.9 (#85)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GPT-4o |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1137 |
| Video-MME | — | 71.9% |
| GeoBench | — | 71% |
| VPCT | — | 40% |
| ScienceQA | — | 88.5% |
Multilingual GPT-4o leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.5 (#247), GPT-4o: 43.4 (#181)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GPT-4o |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1283 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1277 |
| LMArena French | 1144 | 1303 |
| LMArena German | 1125 | 1282 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | 1257 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1286 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1118 | 1292 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1234 |
Instruction Following GPT-4o leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.9 (#262), GPT-4o: 66.8 (#202)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GPT-4o |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1278 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 68.6% |
| IFEval | — | 81.7% |
Long Context GPT-4o leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#244), GPT-4o: 39.4 (#174)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GPT-4o |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1289 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
Writing & Preference GPT-4o leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.2 (#259), GPT-4o: 52.8 (#160)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | GPT-4o |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1130 | 1291 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1302 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 81.8% |
| WildBench | — | 82.8% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 47.6% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than GPT-4o?
GPT-4o is the stronger model overall, scoring 28.5 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or GPT-4o better for coding?
Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.6 versus 25.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and GPT-4o share?
24 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and GPT-4o has 72.