Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Grok 4.6

Grok 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.9 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 1.0 Pro Google

27.3

Rank #332 Confirmed

Grok 4.6 xAI

56.9

Rank #21 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.6 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Grok 4.6 leads 67.0 to 9.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.1% for Gemini 1.0 Pro and 99.2% for Grok 4.6.

Side by side

Gemini 1.0 ProGrok 4.6
ProviderGooglexAI
Noometry Index27.356.9
Released2023-12-132026-08-12
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—500K
Max output—500K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked2449

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.6 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275), Grok 4.6: 58.5 (#16)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGrok 4.6
LMArena Coding11081465
DeepSWE—67.5%
FrontierCode—48%
CursorBench—41.4%
LMArena WebDev—1617
FrontierSWE—25.3%
SciCode—56.5%
WeirdML—67.3%
ALE-Bench—1,508
HumanEval+55.5%—
MBPP+61.4%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 1.0 Pro: —, Grok 4.6: 39.4 (#27)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGrok 4.6
APEX-Agents—65.3%
GDP.pdf—17.2%
Vending-Bench 2—9,047

Reasoning Grok 4.6 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296), Grok 4.6: 61.4 (#20)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGrok 4.6
LMArena Hard Prompts11091447
DTBench45.9%97.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index117.04156.44
ARC-AGI-2—67.1%
SimpleBench—75.9%
NYT Connections (extended)—80%
ARC-AGI-1—87.5%
CritPt—19.7%
Chess Puzzles—40%
EBR-Bench—30.5%
Mystery Game Puzzles—34%
LMCA—48.5%

Math Grok 4.6 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321), Grok 4.6: 67.0 (#24)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGrok 4.6
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.1%99.2%
LMArena Math11321423
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—66%
FrontierMath Tier 4—31.7%
ProofBench—51%
MATH Level 511.2%—

Knowledge Grok 4.6 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291), Grok 4.6: 63.3 (#20)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGrok 4.6
GPQA Diamond34%94%
LMArena Expert10591467
SimpleQA Verified—49.3%
MMLU70%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 1.0 Pro: —, Grok 4.6: 43.6 (#23)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGrok 4.6
LMArena Vision—1263
Blueprint-Bench 2—33.2%
Furniture Assembly—40%
LMArena Document—1452

Multilingual Grok 4.6 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252), Grok 4.6: 53.0 (#74)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGrok 4.6
LMArena Non-English11381420
LMArena Chinese11241480
LMArena French11451461
LMArena German11251431
LMArena Japanese10231376
LMArena Russian11861422
LMArena Spanish11191404
LMArena Korean—1397

Instruction Following Grok 4.6 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267), Grok 4.6: 75.4 (#63)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGrok 4.6
LMArena Instruction Following11141431

Long Context Grok 4.6 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249), Grok 4.6: 44.5 (#66)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGrok 4.6
LMArena Longer Query11321454

Writing & Preference Grok 4.6 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264), Grok 4.6: 62.3 (#80)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGrok 4.6
LMArena Text11491428
LMArena Creative Writing11311428
LMArena Multi-Turn11391425

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Grok 4.6?

Grok 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.9 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Grok 4.6 better for coding?

Grok 4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 58.5 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Grok 4.6 share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.6 has 49.

Related comparisons

Go deeper