Model comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Mixtral 8x7B
Gemini 1.0 Pro and Mixtral 8x7B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (27.3 vs 27.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 23 shared benchmarks.
Google
Mistral AISummary
- They share 23 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 5 categories and Mixtral 8x7B in 3 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Mixtral 8x7B leads 18.8 to 9.3.
- Mixtral 8x7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.0 Pro | Mixtral 8x7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | |
| Noometry Index | 27.3 | 27.1 |
| Released | 2023-12-13 | 2023-12-11 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 32K |
| Max output | — | 32K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.70 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.70 |
| Results tracked | 24 | 38 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275), Mixtral 8x7B: 32.8 (#269)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1126 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | 39.6% |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | 49.7% |
Reasoning Mixtral 8x7B leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296), Mixtral 8x7B: 18.2 (#285)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1115 |
| DTBench | 45.9% | 49.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 117.04 | 118.47 |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 55.2% |
| ForecastBench | — | 56.3 |
| HellaSwag | — | 86.7% |
| PIQA | — | 83.6% |
| WinoGrande | — | 77.2% |
Math Mixtral 8x7B leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321), Mixtral 8x7B: 18.8 (#289)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1147 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | 10% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 10.5% |
| GSM8K | — | 74.4% |
Knowledge Gemini 1.0 Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291), Mixtral 8x7B: 11.0 (#301)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | 30.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1088 |
| MMLU | 70% | 70.6% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 33.5% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 29.6% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 87.3% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 85.8% |
| TriviaQA | — | 82.2% |
Multilingual Gemini 1.0 Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252), Mixtral 8x7B: 29.6 (#266)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1077 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1055 |
| LMArena French | 1145 | 1166 |
| LMArena German | 1125 | 1114 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | 931 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1090 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1119 | 1111 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 968 |
Instruction Following Gemini 1.0 Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267), Mixtral 8x7B: 51.0 (#297)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1109 |
| IFEval | — | 57.5% |
Long Context Too close to call
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249), Mixtral 8x7B: 33.4 (#260)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1103 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 1.0 Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264), Mixtral 8x7B: 34.2 (#270)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1132 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1131 | 1109 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1115 |
| WildBench | — | 67.3% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Mixtral 8x7B?
Gemini 1.0 Pro and Mixtral 8x7B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (27.3 vs 27.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Mixtral 8x7B better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (32.2 vs 32.8); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Mixtral 8x7B share?
23 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Mixtral 8x7B has 38.