Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 1.0 Pro Google

27.3

Rank #332 Confirmed

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct Alibaba (Qwen)

38.1

Rank #190 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads 37.6 to 9.3.
  • Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 1.0 ProQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index27.338.1
Released2023-12-132025-04
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.50
Output $ / M tokens—$7.50
Results tracked2425

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 35.5 (#223)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Coding11081412
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—55.4%
LMArena WebDev—1275
GSO—4.9%
WeirdML—41.2%
ALE-Bench—461.45
AlgoTune—1.44
HumanEval+55.5%—
MBPP+61.4%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 1.0 Pro: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 23.9 (#123)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Terminal-Bench—27.2%

Reasoning Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 25.5 (#149)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts11091372
Kagi LLM Benchmark—49.5%
DTBench45.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index117.04—

Math Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 37.6 (#150)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Math11321365
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.1%—
MATH Level 511.2%—

Knowledge Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 37.0 (#162)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Expert10591338
GPQA Diamond34%—
MMLU70%—

Multilingual Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 47.7 (#148)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Non-English11381346
LMArena Chinese11241357
LMArena French11451398
LMArena German11251325
LMArena Japanese10231310
LMArena Russian11861366
LMArena Spanish11191360
LMArena Korean—1305

Instruction Following Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 71.6 (#147)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following11141355

Long Context Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 42.0 (#131)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query11321378

Writing & Preference Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 55.3 (#147)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Text11491357
LMArena Creative Writing11311333
LMArena Multi-Turn11391365

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct better for coding?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.5 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has 25.

Related comparisons

Go deeper