Model comparison
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs Mercury 2
Mercury 2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B scores higher in 1 category and Mercury 2 in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Mercury 2 leads 35.6 to 16.0.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Mercury 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Inception | |
| Noometry Index | 29.7 | 38.8 |
| Released | 2024-10-03 | 2026-02-20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 50K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.75 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 34.9 (#221), Mercury 2: 33.2 (#250)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1218 | 1391 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1170 |
| SciCode | — | 38.7% |
| WeirdML | — | 43.2% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 785.58 |
Reasoning Mercury 2 leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 19.2 (#242), Mercury 2: 23.0 (#170)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1210 | 1362 |
| CritPt | — | 0.8% |
| DTBench | 50% | — |
Math Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 13.3 (#296), Mercury 2: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 4.6% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1207 | — |
Knowledge Mercury 2 leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 16.0 (#285), Mercury 2: 35.6 (#170)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1185 | 1358 |
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 12.3% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 27.6 (#110), Mercury 2: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1044 | — |
Multilingual Mercury 2 leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 38.6 (#224), Mercury 2: 46.8 (#153)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1215 | 1331 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1231 | 1416 |
| LMArena Russian | 1236 | 1303 |
| LMArena French | 1233 | — |
| LMArena German | 1206 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1150 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1140 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1212 | — |
Instruction Following Mercury 2 leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 63.1 (#231), Mercury 2: 70.4 (#161)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1199 | 1328 |
Long Context Mercury 2 leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 36.9 (#220), Mercury 2: 40.4 (#149)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1219 | 1329 |
Writing & Preference Mercury 2 leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 43.0 (#227), Mercury 2: 54.0 (#151)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1226 | 1355 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1218 | 1289 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1185 | 1358 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B better than Mercury 2?
Mercury 2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B or Mercury 2 better for coding?
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.9 versus 33.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Mercury 2 share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B has 21 scored results on Noometry and Mercury 2 has 17.