Model comparison
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) vs GPT-4o
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.1 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 44 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 44 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) scores higher in 8 categories and GPT-4o in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads 25.8 to 10.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 70.4% for Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) and 53.3% for GPT-4o.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | GPT-4o | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Noometry Index | 32.1 | 28.6 |
| Released | 2024-02-15 | 2024-05-13 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $10 |
| Results tracked | 45 | 72 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 34.2 (#241), GPT-4o: 24.8 (#328)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | GPT-4o |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 22.2% | 25.1% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 43.8% | 51.1% |
| LMArena Coding | 1294 | 1297 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 57.5% | 61.1% |
| CadEval | 34% | 26% |
| HumanEval+ | 79.3% | 87.2% |
| MBPP+ | 74.6% | 72.2% |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 31% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 21.6% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 45.3% |
| GSO | — | 0% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 51.4% |
Agentic & Tool Use GPT-4o leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 17.9 (#145), GPT-4o: 21.0 (#141)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | GPT-4o |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 3.4% | 8.6% |
| Cybench | 7.5% | 12.5% |
| BALROG | 21% | 32.3% |
| GDPval | — | 9.9% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1006 |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 40.8% |
Reasoning Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 12.3 (#338), GPT-4o: 9.4 (#343)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | GPT-4o |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.8% | 0% |
| SimpleBench | 27.1% | 17.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1296 | 1281 |
| DTBench | 59% | 64.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 131.73 | 128.97 |
| ForecastBench | 58.4 | 57.7 |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 4.5% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 13% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.8% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 55.8% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 60.9% |
| LMCA | — | 16.6% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 89.2% | — |
| LiveBench | — | 55.3% |
Math Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 25.8 (#266), GPT-4o: 10.6 (#312)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | GPT-4o |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 23.1% | 6.4% |
| Omni-MATH | 36.4% | 29.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1315 | 1285 |
| MATH Level 5 | 70.4% | 53.3% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 0.4% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 49.5% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 0.3% |
Knowledge Too close to call
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 29.4 (#239), GPT-4o: 28.8 (#242)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | GPT-4o |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 57.2% | 49.2% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.6% | 2.7% |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | 71.3% |
| Confabulations | 13.5% | 15.3% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 53.4% | 52% |
| LMArena Expert | 1279 | 1250 |
| MMLU | 86.9% | 88.1% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 26% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 9.6% |
Multimodal Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 36.8 (#77), GPT-4o: 34.5 (#91)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | GPT-4o |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1161 | 1137 |
| Video-MME | 75% | 71.9% |
| GeoBench | — | 71% |
| VPCT | — | 40% |
| ScienceQA | — | 88.5% |
Multilingual Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 45.3 (#174), GPT-4o: 43.2 (#186)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | GPT-4o |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1312 | 1283 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1331 | 1277 |
| LMArena French | 1302 | 1304 |
| LMArena German | 1286 | 1282 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1292 | 1257 |
| LMArena Korean | 1298 | 1234 |
| LMArena Russian | 1320 | 1286 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1311 | 1292 |
Instruction Following Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 68.6 (#185), GPT-4o: 66.6 (#207)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | GPT-4o |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 83.7% | 81.7% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1297 | 1278 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 68.6% |
Long Context Too close to call
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 39.8 (#169), GPT-4o: 39.4 (#179)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | GPT-4o |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1308 | 1289 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 52.4 (#172), GPT-4o: 52.6 (#166)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | GPT-4o |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1319 | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1333 | 1292 |
| WildBench | 81.3% | 82.8% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1296 | 1302 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 81.8% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 47.6% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) better than GPT-4o?
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.1 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) or GPT-4o better for coding?
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.2 versus 24.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) and GPT-4o share?
44 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) has 45 scored results on Noometry and GPT-4o has 72.