Model comparison
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) vs Llama 13b
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 23.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Google
MetaSummary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) scores higher in 4 categories and Llama 13b in 2 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads 52.5 to 13.9.
- Llama 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Llama 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | |
| Noometry Index | 31.9 | 23.9 |
| Released | 2024-02-15 | 2023-02-24 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 45 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 33.8 (#239), Llama 13b: 20.9 (#332)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1294 | 683 |
| WeirdML | 22.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 43.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 57.5% | — |
| CadEval | 34% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 79.3% | — |
| MBPP+ | 74.6% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 17.8 (#137), Llama 13b: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 3.4% | — |
| Cybench | 7.5% | — |
| BALROG | 21% | — |
Reasoning Llama 13b leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 12.3 (#332), Llama 13b: 13.4 (#327)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1296 | 728 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 89.2% | 37.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 131.73 | 100.09 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.8% | — |
| SimpleBench | 27.1% | — |
| DTBench | 59% | — |
| ForecastBench | 58.4 | — |
| HellaSwag | — | 79.2% |
| LAMBADA | — | 75.2% |
| PIQA | — | 80.1% |
| WinoGrande | — | 73% |
Math Too close to call
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 24.4 (#260), Llama 13b: 24.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1315 | 838 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 23.1% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 36.4% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 70.4% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 20.6% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 29.3 (#228), Llama 13b: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 86.9% | 47.7% |
| GPQA Diamond | 57.2% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 13.5% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 53.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1279 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 52.7% |
| BoolQ | — | 78.7% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 56.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 77.9% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 36.2 (#72), Llama 13b: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1161 | — |
| Video-MME | 75% | — |
| ScienceQA | — | 43.3% |
Multilingual Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 45.5 (#169), Llama 13b: 16.8 (#292)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1312 | 819 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1331 | — |
| LMArena French | 1301 | — |
| LMArena German | 1286 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1292 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1298 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1320 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1310 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 68.8 (#180), Llama 13b: 36.9 (#300)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1297 | 781 |
| IFEval | 83.7% | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 39.7 (#164), Llama 13b: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1308 | — |
Writing & Preference Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 52.5 (#167), Llama 13b: 13.9 (#307)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1319 | 834 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1333 | 794 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1296 | 753 |
| WildBench | 81.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) better than Llama 13b?
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 23.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) or Llama 13b better for coding?
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.8 versus 20.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) and Llama 13b share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) has 45 scored results on Noometry and Llama 13b has 21.