Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.8 vs 37.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 24 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 24 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher in 4 categories and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite in 5 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads 40.1 to 33.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA (HELM): 50% for Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and 30.9% for Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Noometry Index | 37.8 | 37.0 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2025-06-17 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.10 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Results tracked | 32 | 33 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 37.9 (#185), Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.5 (#173)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1322 | 1373 |
| WeirdML | — | 35.2% |
| LiveBench Coding | 47.1% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 325.9 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: —, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 28.0 (#96)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 36.9% |
Reasoning Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 22.0 (#210), Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 22.2 (#205)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1324 | 1377 |
| DTBench | 52.5% | 62.8% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 40.5% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 50.1% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 65.5% | — |
| LMCA | — | 18.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 133.94 |
| ForecastBench | 57.1 | — |
| LiveBench | 54.3% | — |
Math Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 34.1 (#196), Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.0 (#144)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 37.4% | 48% |
| LMArena Math | 1309 | 1373 |
| LiveBench Math | 58.1% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 35.0 (#189), Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 32.5 (#210)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 72% | 53.7% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 50% | 30.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1305 | 1373 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 3.3% |
Multimodal Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 31.2 (#109), Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 29.1 (#114)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1100 | 1198 |
| VPCT | — | 30% |
Multilingual Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 46.0 (#161), Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 49.3 (#134)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1323 | 1369 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1339 | 1404 |
| LMArena French | 1347 | 1388 |
| LMArena German | 1306 | 1389 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1301 | 1359 |
| LMArena Korean | 1325 | 1360 |
| LMArena Russian | 1328 | 1373 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1313 | 1396 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 70.4 (#163), Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 70.0 (#168)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 82.4% | 81% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1305 | 1367 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 78.3% | — |
Long Context Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 40.1 (#160), Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 33.3 (#262)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1320 | 1373 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 47.2% |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 51.7 (#177), Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 56.8 (#135)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1330 | 1379 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1367 |
| WildBench | 79% | 81.8% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1307 | 1366 |
| LiveBench Language | 34.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite better than Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite?
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.8 vs 37.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite or Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (37.9 vs 38.5); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite share?
24 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has 32 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has 33.