Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs Gemini 3.5 Flash
Gemini 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.2 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher in 0 categories and Gemini 3.5 Flash in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.5 Flash leads 62.8 to 22.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 52.5% for Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and 94.7% for Gemini 3.5 Flash.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Gemini 3.5 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Noometry Index | 37.8 | 54.2 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2026-05-19 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $9 |
| Results tracked | 32 | 54 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 3.5 Flash leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 37.9 (#185), Gemini 3.5 Flash: 49.4 (#49)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1322 | 1492 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 79.3% |
| DeepSWE | — | 37.4% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1499 |
| SciCode | — | 53.1% |
| WeirdML | — | 62.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | 47.1% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 911.02 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: —, Gemini 3.5 Flash: 24.7 (#114)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 27.5% |
| GBAEval | — | 6.7% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 14% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 5,396 |
Reasoning Gemini 3.5 Flash leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 22.0 (#210), Gemini 3.5 Flash: 62.8 (#18)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1324 | 1488 |
| DTBench | 52.5% | 94.7% |
| ForecastBench | 57.1 | 59 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 72.1% |
| SimpleBench | — | 76.7% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 92.6% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 92.5% |
| CritPt | — | 13.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 50% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 25.4% |
| EBR-Bench | — | 4.8% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 50.1% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 32% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 65.5% | — |
| LMCA | — | 47.1% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 58.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 154.46 |
| LiveBench | 54.3% | — |
Math Gemini 3.5 Flash leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 34.1 (#196), Gemini 3.5 Flash: 60.7 (#36)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1309 | 1504 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 62.8% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 26.8% |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 76.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 95.6% |
| ProofBench | — | 31% |
| Omni-MATH | 37.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 58.1% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 39% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 14.6% |
Knowledge Gemini 3.5 Flash leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 35.0 (#189), Gemini 3.5 Flash: 66.3 (#11)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1305 | 1495 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 92.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 66.2% |
| MMLU-Pro | 72% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 50% | — |
Multimodal Gemini 3.5 Flash leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 31.2 (#109), Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.7 (#15)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1100 | 1310 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 33.6% |
| LMArena Document | — | 1463 |
Multilingual Gemini 3.5 Flash leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 46.0 (#161), Gemini 3.5 Flash: 57.0 (#13)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1323 | 1476 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1339 | 1526 |
| LMArena French | 1347 | 1490 |
| LMArena German | 1306 | 1492 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1301 | 1486 |
| LMArena Korean | 1325 | 1451 |
| LMArena Russian | 1328 | 1493 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1313 | 1480 |
Instruction Following Gemini 3.5 Flash leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 70.4 (#163), Gemini 3.5 Flash: 77.0 (#30)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1305 | 1467 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 78.3% | — |
| IFEval | 82.4% | — |
Long Context Gemini 3.5 Flash leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 40.1 (#160), Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.4 (#38)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1320 | 1482 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 3.5 Flash leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 51.7 (#177), Gemini 3.5 Flash: 65.5 (#47)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1330 | 1482 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1470 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1307 | 1481 |
| WildBench | 79% | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1087 |
| LiveBench Language | 34.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite better than Gemini 3.5 Flash?
Gemini 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.2 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite or Gemini 3.5 Flash better for coding?
Gemini 3.5 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.4 versus 37.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and Gemini 3.5 Flash share?
20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has 32 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 3.5 Flash has 54.