Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs Grok 4.6
Grok 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.9 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.6 in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.6 leads 61.4 to 22.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 52.5% for Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and 97.3% for Grok 4.6.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Grok 4.6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | |
| Noometry Index | 37.8 | 56.9 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2026-08-12 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 500K |
| Max output | — | 500K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $6 |
| Results tracked | 32 | 49 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4.6 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 37.9 (#185), Grok 4.6: 58.5 (#16)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1322 | 1465 |
| DeepSWE | — | 67.5% |
| FrontierCode | — | 48% |
| CursorBench | — | 41.4% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1617 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 25.3% |
| SciCode | — | 56.5% |
| WeirdML | — | 67.3% |
| LiveBench Coding | 47.1% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,508 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: —, Grok 4.6: 39.4 (#27)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 65.3% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 17.2% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 9,047 |
Reasoning Grok 4.6 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 22.0 (#210), Grok 4.6: 61.4 (#20)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1324 | 1447 |
| DTBench | 52.5% | 97.3% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 67.1% |
| SimpleBench | — | 75.9% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 80% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 87.5% |
| CritPt | — | 19.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 40% |
| EBR-Bench | — | 30.5% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 50.1% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 34% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 65.5% | — |
| LMCA | — | 48.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 156.44 |
| ForecastBench | 57.1 | — |
| LiveBench | 54.3% | — |
Math Grok 4.6 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 34.1 (#196), Grok 4.6: 67.0 (#24)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1309 | 1423 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 66% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 31.7% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 99.2% |
| ProofBench | — | 51% |
| Omni-MATH | 37.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 58.1% | — |
Knowledge Grok 4.6 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 35.0 (#189), Grok 4.6: 63.3 (#20)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1305 | 1467 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 94% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 49.3% |
| MMLU-Pro | 72% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 50% | — |
Multimodal Grok 4.6 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 31.2 (#109), Grok 4.6: 43.6 (#23)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1100 | 1263 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 33.2% |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 40% |
| LMArena Document | — | 1452 |
Multilingual Grok 4.6 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 46.0 (#161), Grok 4.6: 53.0 (#74)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1323 | 1420 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1339 | 1480 |
| LMArena French | 1347 | 1461 |
| LMArena German | 1306 | 1431 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1301 | 1376 |
| LMArena Korean | 1325 | 1397 |
| LMArena Russian | 1328 | 1422 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1313 | 1404 |
Instruction Following Grok 4.6 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 70.4 (#163), Grok 4.6: 75.4 (#63)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1305 | 1431 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 78.3% | — |
| IFEval | 82.4% | — |
Long Context Grok 4.6 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 40.1 (#160), Grok 4.6: 44.5 (#66)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1320 | 1454 |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.6 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 51.7 (#177), Grok 4.6: 62.3 (#80)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1330 | 1428 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1428 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1307 | 1425 |
| WildBench | 79% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 34.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite better than Grok 4.6?
Grok 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.9 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite or Grok 4.6 better for coding?
Grok 4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 58.5 versus 37.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and Grok 4.6 share?
19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has 32 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.6 has 49.