Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs MiMo-V2-Flash

MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite Google

37.8

Rank #194 Confirmed

MiMo-V2-Flash Xiaomi

41.3

Rank #138 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher in 1 category and MiMo-V2-Flash in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 59.7 to 51.7.
  • MiMo-V2-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 2.0 Flash-LiteMiMo-V2-Flash
ProviderGoogleXiaomi
Noometry Index37.841.3
Released2025-02-052025-12-16
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.14
Output $ / M tokens—$0.28
Results tracked3221

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 37.9 (#185), MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Coding13221443
LMArena WebDev—1330
SciCode—25.9%
LiveBench Coding47.1%—
ALE-Bench—737.95

Reasoning MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 22.0 (#210), MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts13241420
CritPt—0%
LiveBench Reasoning50.1%—
DTBench52.5%—
LiveBench Data Analysis65.5%—
ForecastBench57.1—
LiveBench54.3%—

Math MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 34.1 (#196), MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Math13091396
Omni-MATH37.4%—
LiveBench Math58.1%—

Knowledge MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 35.0 (#189), MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Expert13051425
MMLU-Pro72%—
GPQA (HELM)50%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 31.2 (#109), MiMo-V2-Flash: —

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Vision1100—

Multilingual MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 46.0 (#161), MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Non-English13231392
LMArena Chinese13391462
LMArena French13471429
LMArena German13061395
LMArena Japanese13011325
LMArena Korean13251358
LMArena Russian13281387
LMArena Spanish13131420

Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 70.4 (#163), MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following13051392
LiveBench Instruction Following78.3%—
IFEval82.4%—

Long Context MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 40.1 (#160), MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Longer Query13201409

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 51.7 (#177), MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Text13301411
LMArena Creative Writing13191375
LMArena Multi-Turn13071404
WildBench79%—
LiveBench Language34.3%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite better than MiMo-V2-Flash?

MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.9 versus 36.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and MiMo-V2-Flash share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has 32 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper