Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs Gemini 2.0 Pro
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 35.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 1 category and Gemini 2.0 Pro in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 37.8 to 28.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Fiction.LiveBench: 61.1% for Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and 41.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemini 2.0 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Noometry Index | 35.1 | 39.1 |
| Released | 2024-12-06 | 2025-02-05 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 54 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.4 (#315), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 38.2% | 35.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.4% | 63.5% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 13.5% | — |
| WeirdML | 25.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.9% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1350 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.9% | — |
| CadEval | 30% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.1 (#92), Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 11.4% | — |
Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#318), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 1.1% | 0.7% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 78.2% | 60.1% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.4% | 68% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.36 | 135.06 |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | 65.1% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 31.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1346 | — |
| DTBench | 63.2% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 37.9 (#146), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 75.8% | 71% |
| MATH Level 5 | 82.2% | 83.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 45.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1352 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#213), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | 65.7% |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | 18.4% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 6.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 55.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1339 | — |
| MMLU | 79.7% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.5 (#79), Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1158 | — |
| GeoBench | 77% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.4 (#149), Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1342 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | — |
| LMArena French | 1391 | — |
| LMArena German | 1353 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1294 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1313 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1351 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1363 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.4 (#97), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 85.8% | 83.4% |
| IFEval | 84.1% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1336 | — |
Long Context Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#203), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | 41.7% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1344 | — |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.5 (#190), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Language | 51.3% | 44.9% |
| LMArena Text | 1354 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1340 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1128 | — |
| WildBench | 80% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than Gemini 2.0 Pro?
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 35.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) or Gemini 2.0 Pro better for coding?
Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 28.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and Gemini 2.0 Pro share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14.