Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs Gemma 7B
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.8 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 6 categories and Gemma 7B in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads 74.6 to 51.7.
- Gemma 7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemma 7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Noometry Index | 34.8 | 29.5 |
| Released | 2024-12-06 | 2024-02-21 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 54 | 27 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 7B leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.2 (#308), Gemma 7B: 29.9 (#290)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1351 | 1048 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 13.5% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 38.2% | — |
| WeirdML | 25.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.9% | — |
| CadEval | 30% | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 28.7% |
| MBPP+ | — | 43.4% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.0 (#85), Gemma 7B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 11.4% | — |
Reasoning Gemma 7B leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#308), Gemma 7B: 19.0 (#247)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1346 | 1042 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.36 | 111.74 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 31.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 1.1% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 78.2% | — |
| DTBench | 63.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.4% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 48.7% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 55.1% |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.2% |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | — |
| PIQA | — | 81.2% |
| WinoGrande | — | 79% |
Math Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.1 (#127), Gemma 7B: 28.7 (#225)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1351 | 1066 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 75.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 82.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 46.4% |
Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#207), Gemma 7B: 26.8 (#248)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1340 | 1002 |
| MMLU | 79.7% | 66.1% |
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 6.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 55.6% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 78.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 83.2% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 78.6% |
| TriviaQA | — | 72.3% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 35.9 (#74), Gemma 7B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1158 | — |
| GeoBench | 77% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.6 (#144), Gemma 7B: 25.3 (#282)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1342 | 999 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | 1035 |
| LMArena French | 1390 | 1024 |
| LMArena Russian | 1351 | 993 |
| LMArena German | 1354 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1293 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1314 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1363 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.6 (#91), Gemma 7B: 51.7 (#290)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1336 | 1017 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 85.8% | — |
| IFEval | 84.1% | — |
Long Context Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#198), Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#277)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1345 | 1022 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | — |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.8 (#184), Gemma 7B: 27.2 (#297)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1354 | 1056 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1340 | 1024 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | 963 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1128 | — |
| WildBench | 80% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 51.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than Gemma 7B?
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.8 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) or Gemma 7B better for coding?
Gemma 7B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 29.9 versus 28.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and Gemma 7B share?
15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 7B has 27.