Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs Grok 3
Grok 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 35.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 36 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 36 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 1 category and Grok 3 in 8 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok 3 leads 46.2 to 32.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 37.8% for Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and 61.3% for Grok 3.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Grok 3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | |
| Noometry Index | 35.1 | 39.9 |
| Released | 2024-12-06 | 2025-04-09 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 54 | 40 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 3 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.4 (#315), Grok 3: 41.9 (#115)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 38.2% | 53.3% |
| WeirdML | 25.8% | 37.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1350 | 1432 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 13.5% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.9% | — |
| CadEval | 30% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Grok 3 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.1 (#92), Grok 3: 30.5 (#76)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 11.4% | — |
| BALROG | — | 29.5% |
Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#318), Grok 3: 13.7 (#333)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | 0% |
| SimpleBench | 31.1% | 36.1% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | 61.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1346 | 1434 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.36 | 138.33 |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 5.5% |
| EnigmaEval | 1.1% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 78.2% | — |
| DTBench | 63.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.4% | — |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | — |
Math Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 37.9 (#146), Grok 3: 38.0 (#145)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | 55.6% |
| Omni-MATH | 45.9% | 46.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1352 | 1391 |
| MATH Level 5 | 82.2% | 88.7% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | 3.8% |
| LiveBench Math | 75.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |
Knowledge Grok 3 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#213), Grok 3: 46.2 (#82)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | 75.8% |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | 78.8% |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | 14.2% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 55.6% | 65% |
| LMArena Expert | 1339 | 1421 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 6.6% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.8% |
| MMLU | 79.7% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.5 (#79), Grok 3: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1158 | — |
| GeoBench | 77% | — |
Multilingual Grok 3 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.4 (#149), Grok 3: 52.3 (#87)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1342 | 1410 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | 1448 |
| LMArena French | 1391 | 1460 |
| LMArena German | 1353 | 1431 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1294 | 1387 |
| LMArena Korean | 1313 | 1373 |
| LMArena Russian | 1351 | 1416 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1363 | 1417 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.4 (#97), Grok 3: 75.0 (#73)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 84.1% | 88.4% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1336 | 1409 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 85.8% | — |
Long Context Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#203), Grok 3: 38.7 (#192)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | 58.3% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1344 | 1439 |
Writing & Preference Grok 3 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.5 (#190), Grok 3: 55.8 (#141)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1354 | 1426 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1340 | 1414 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.8% | 76.4% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1128 | 1186 |
| WildBench | 80% | 84.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | 1425 |
| LiveBench Language | 51.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than Grok 3?
Grok 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 35.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) or Grok 3 better for coding?
Grok 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.9 versus 28.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and Grok 3 share?
36 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and Grok 3 has 40.