Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b score almost the same on the Noometry Index (35.1 vs 35.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Google
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 5 categories and Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads 74.4 to 61.3.
- Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | |
| Noometry Index | 35.1 | 35.7 |
| Released | 2024-12-06 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 54 | 11 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.4 (#315), Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: 34.4 (#235)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1350 | 1183 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 13.5% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 38.2% | — |
| WeirdML | 25.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.9% | — |
| CadEval | 30% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.1 (#92), Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 11.4% | — |
Reasoning Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#318), Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: 22.8 (#188)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1346 | 1174 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 31.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 1.1% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 78.2% | — |
| DTBench | 63.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.36 | — |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 37.9 (#146), Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: 33.9 (#198)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1352 | 1195 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 75.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 82.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#213), Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 6.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 55.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1339 | — |
| MMLU | 79.7% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.5 (#79), Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1158 | — |
| GeoBench | 77% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.4 (#149), Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: 35.4 (#246)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1342 | 1169 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | 1176 |
| LMArena Russian | 1351 | 1193 |
| LMArena French | 1391 | — |
| LMArena German | 1353 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1294 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1313 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1363 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.4 (#97), Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: 61.3 (#246)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1336 | 1174 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 85.8% | — |
| IFEval | 84.1% | — |
Long Context Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#203), Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: 35.8 (#239)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1344 | 1181 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | — |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.5 (#190), Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: 39.7 (#245)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1354 | 1193 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1340 | 1182 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | 1154 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1128 | — |
| WildBench | 80% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 51.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b?
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b score almost the same on the Noometry Index (35.1 vs 35.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) or Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b better for coding?
Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.4 versus 28.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b has 11.