Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.1 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
Google
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 6 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads 74.4 to 61.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MMLU-Pro: 73.7% for Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and 41.4% for Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct.
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | |
| Noometry Index | 35.1 | 32.7 |
| Released | 2024-12-06 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 54 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.4 (#315), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1350 | 1210 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 13.5% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 38.2% | — |
| WeirdML | 25.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.9% | — |
| CadEval | 30% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.1 (#92), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 11.4% | — |
Reasoning Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#318), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1346 | 1208 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 31.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 1.1% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 78.2% | — |
| DTBench | 63.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.36 | — |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 37.9 (#146), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 45.9% | 16.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1352 | 1208 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 75.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 82.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#213), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | 41.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 55.6% | 28.7% |
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 6.6% | — |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1339 | — |
| MMLU | 79.7% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.5 (#79), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1158 | — |
| GeoBench | 77% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.4 (#149), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1342 | 1160 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | 1192 |
| LMArena Russian | 1351 | 1187 |
| LMArena French | 1391 | — |
| LMArena German | 1353 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1294 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1313 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1363 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.4 (#97), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 84.1% | 78% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1336 | 1186 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 85.8% | — |
Long Context Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#203), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1344 | 1194 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | — |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.5 (#190), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1354 | 1218 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1340 | 1199 |
| WildBench | 80% | 73.4% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | 1221 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1128 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 51.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.1 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.2 versus 28.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.