Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 2 categories and Gemini 2.5 Pro in 5 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where Gemini 2.5 Pro leads 59.8 to 29.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Fiction.LiveBench: 41.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 91.7% for Gemini 2.5 Pro.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemini 2.5 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 45.0 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2025-03-25 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $10 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 78 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), Gemini 2.5 Pro: 42.4 (#101)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | 83.1% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | 85.9% |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 57.6% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 53.6% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1227 |
| SciCode | — | 42.8% |
| GSO | — | 3.9% |
| WeirdML | — | 54% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1452 |
| CadEval | — | 64% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 785.52 |
| AlgoTune | — | 1.51 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Gemini 2.5 Pro: 29.2 (#88)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 32.6% |
| GDPval | — | 23.3% |
| Remote Labor Index | — | 0.8% |
| TheAgentCompany | — | 30.3% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 13.7% |
| DeepResearch Bench | — | 42.8% |
| BALROG | — | 43.3% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1142 |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 55.4% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 573.64 |
Reasoning Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), Gemini 2.5 Pro: 28.8 (#99)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | 5.6% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | 89.8% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | 79.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | 145.32 |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | 82.3% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 4.9% |
| SimpleBench | — | 62.4% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 70.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 41% |
| CritPt | — | 2% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 20% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1455 |
| DTBench | — | 82.4% |
| LMCA | — | 34.8% |
| ForecastBench | — | 61.3 |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), Gemini 2.5 Pro: 32.5 (#213)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 71% | 90.2% |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | 95.9% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 24.6% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 0% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 84.7% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 41.6% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1450 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 14.1% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 4.2% |
Knowledge Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), Gemini 2.5 Pro: 56.0 (#46)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 85.3% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | 10.6% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 21.6% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 86.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 7% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 74.9% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1452 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Gemini 2.5 Pro: 45.2 (#18)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1263 |
| GeoBench | — | 86% |
| VPCT | — | 48% |
| LMArena Document | — | 1421 |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 44.7% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Gemini 2.5 Pro: 55.3 (#31)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1451 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1507 |
| LMArena French | — | 1472 |
| LMArena German | — | 1487 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1461 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1434 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1461 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1473 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), Gemini 2.5 Pro: 75.0 (#75)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | 80.6% |
| IFEval | — | 84% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1437 |
Long Context Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), Gemini 2.5 Pro: 59.8 (#5)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | 91.7% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1449 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), Gemini 2.5 Pro: 63.7 (#62)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | 67.8% |
| LMArena Text | — | 1458 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1454 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 83.8% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1421 |
| WildBench | — | 85.7% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1453 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Gemini 2.5 Pro?
Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Gemini 2.5 Pro better for coding?
Gemini 2.5 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 37.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Gemini 2.5 Pro share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.5 Pro has 78.