Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Gemma 4 31B IT

Gemma 4 31B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 2.0 Pro Google

38.6

Rank #171 Confirmed

Gemma 4 31B IT Google

43.2

Rank #85 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 1 category and Gemma 4 31B IT in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in long context, where Gemma 4 31B IT leads 44.2 to 29.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 65.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 75.8% for Gemma 4 31B IT.
  • Gemma 4 31B IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 2.0 ProGemma 4 31B IT
ProviderGoogleGoogle
Noometry Index38.643.2
Released2025-02-052026-04-02
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—33K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.09
Output $ / M tokens—$0.34
Results tracked1435

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182), Gemma 4 31B IT: 41.9 (#98)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGemma 4 31B IT
Aider Polyglot35.6%—
LMArena WebDev—1364
SciCode—43.4%
WeirdML—52.3%
LiveBench Coding63.5%—
LMArena Coding—1459
ALE-Bench—925.5

Reasoning Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194), Gemma 4 31B IT: 26.4 (#119)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGemma 4 31B IT
Epoch Capabilities Index135.06142.74
Kagi LLM Benchmark—63.5%
NYT Connections (extended)—70.6%
CritPt—1.4%
Chess Puzzles—5%
EnigmaEval0.7%—
Thematic Generalization—53%
LiveBench Reasoning60.1%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1448
DTBench—82.7%
LiveBench Data Analysis68%—
LMCA—39.3%
Surface Evolver Bench—30.6%
LiveBench65.1%—

Math Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101), Gemma 4 31B IT: 41.3 (#72)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGemma 4 31B IT
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—73.3%
LiveBench Math71%—
LMArena Math—1464
MATH Level 583.5%—

Knowledge Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156), Gemma 4 31B IT: 37.9 (#141)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGemma 4 31B IT
GPQA Diamond65.7%75.8%
SimpleQA Verified—10.4%
Confabulations18.4%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate—7.4%
LMArena Expert—1465

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Gemma 4 31B IT: 41.0 (#32)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGemma 4 31B IT
LMArena Vision—1278
LMArena Document—1425

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Gemma 4 31B IT: 54.0 (#52)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGemma 4 31B IT
LMArena Non-English—1431
LMArena Chinese—1478
LMArena French—1436
LMArena Russian—1462
LMArena Spanish—1443

Instruction Following Too close to call

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57), Gemma 4 31B IT: 75.6 (#58)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGemma 4 31B IT
LiveBench Instruction Following83.4%—
LMArena Instruction Following—1433

Long Context Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287), Gemma 4 31B IT: 44.2 (#67)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGemma 4 31B IT
Fiction.LiveBench41.7%—
LMArena Longer Query—1446

Writing & Preference Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164), Gemma 4 31B IT: 60.7 (#92)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGemma 4 31B IT
LMArena Text—1443
LMArena Creative Writing—1416
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1368
EQ-Bench 4—1120
LMArena Multi-Turn—1452
LiveBench Language44.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Gemma 4 31B IT?

Gemma 4 31B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Gemma 4 31B IT better for coding?

Gemma 4 31B IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.9 versus 37.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Gemma 4 31B IT share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 4 31B IT has 35.

Related comparisons

Go deeper