Model comparison

Gemini 2.0 Pro vs GPT-4.5

Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 36.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 2.0 Pro Google

38.6

Rank #171 Confirmed

GPT-4.5 OpenAI

36.9

Rank #200 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 4 categories and GPT-4.5 in 3 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in long context, where GPT-4.5 leads 40.4 to 29.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Fiction.LiveBench: 41.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 63.9% for GPT-4.5.

Side by side

Gemini 2.0 Pro and GPT-4.5 specifications
Gemini 2.0 ProGPT-4.5
ProviderGoogleOpenAI
Noometry Index38.636.9
Released2025-02-052025-02-27
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1442

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-4.5 leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182), GPT-4.5: 41.8 (#102)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGPT-4.5
Aider Polyglot35.6%44.9%
LiveBench Coding63.5%75.2%
WeirdML—39.4%
LMArena Coding—1397

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, GPT-4.5: 27.6 (#92)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGPT-4.5
Cybench—17.5%

Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194), GPT-4.5: 14.1 (#320)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGPT-4.5
EnigmaEval0.7%3.2%
LiveBench Reasoning60.1%71.1%
LiveBench Data Analysis68%64.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index135.06136.74
LiveBench65.1%69%
ARC-AGI-2—0.8%
SimpleBench—34.5%
ARC-AGI-1—10.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1404
ForecastBench—61.7

Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101), GPT-4.5: 31.0 (#200)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGPT-4.5
LiveBench Math71%69.3%
MATH Level 583.5%78.6%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—37.8%
LMArena Math—1412

Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156), GPT-4.5: 32.4 (#205)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGPT-4.5
GPQA Diamond65.7%68.7%
Confabulations18.4%13.6%
Humanity's Last Exam—5.4%
LMArena Expert—1394

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, GPT-4.5: 37.0 (#68)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGPT-4.5
LMArena Vision—1195
VPCT—45%

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, GPT-4.5: 52.7 (#78)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGPT-4.5
LMArena Non-English—1413
LMArena Chinese—1421
LMArena French—1417
LMArena German—1457
LMArena Japanese—1416
LMArena Korean—1392
LMArena Russian—1419

Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57), GPT-4.5: 72.8 (#129)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGPT-4.5
LiveBench Instruction Following83.4%72.3%
LMArena Instruction Following—1404

Long Context GPT-4.5 leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287), GPT-4.5: 40.4 (#150)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGPT-4.5
Fiction.LiveBench41.7%63.9%
LMArena Longer Query—1406

Writing & Preference GPT-4.5 leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164), GPT-4.5: 57.1 (#129)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGPT-4.5
LiveBench Language44.9%61.5%
LMArena Text—1417
LMArena Creative Writing—1394
Short-Story Creative Writing—75.6%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1258
LMArena Multi-Turn—1444

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than GPT-4.5?

Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 36.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or GPT-4.5 better for coding?

GPT-4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 37.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and GPT-4.5 share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and GPT-4.5 has 42.

Related comparisons

Go deeper