Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs GPT-6 Sol
GPT-6 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.2 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-6 Sol leads 49.3 to 21.6.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-6 Sol | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 49.2 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2026-09-22 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $10 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 22 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-6 Sol leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182), GPT-6 Sol: 59.6 (#11)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | — | 68.8% |
| FrontierCode | — | 49.3% |
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1692 |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1453 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, GPT-6 Sol: 33.5 (#49)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| GDP.pdf | — | 28% |
Reasoning GPT-6 Sol leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194), GPT-6 Sol: 49.3 (#34)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 90.1% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| EBR-Bench | — | 53.3% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1420 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101), GPT-6 Sol: 35.8 (#135)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1404 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
Knowledge GPT-6 Sol leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156), GPT-6 Sol: 43.0 (#87)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 6.5% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1449 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, GPT-6 Sol: 47.6 (#9)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | — | 58.3% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, GPT-6 Sol: 51.0 (#113)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1389 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1416 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1407 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1377 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57), GPT-6 Sol: 74.4 (#97)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1406 |
Long Context GPT-6 Sol leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287), GPT-6 Sol: 43.2 (#100)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1415 |
Writing & Preference GPT-6 Sol leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164), GPT-6 Sol: 72.3 (#15)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1396 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1392 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 2125 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1405 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than GPT-6 Sol?
GPT-6 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.2 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or GPT-6 Sol better for coding?
GPT-6 Sol scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.6 versus 37.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and GPT-6 Sol share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and GPT-6 Sol has 22.