Model comparison

Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Grok 3

Gemini 2.0 Pro and Grok 3 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.1 vs 39.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 2.0 Pro Google

39.1

Rank #173 Confirmed

Grok 3 xAI

39.9

Rank #157 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 3 categories and Grok 3 in 4 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok 3 leads 46.2 to 36.5.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Aider Polyglot: 35.6% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 53.3% for Grok 3.

Side by side

Gemini 2.0 Pro and Grok 3 specifications
Gemini 2.0 ProGrok 3
ProviderGooglexAI
Noometry Index39.139.9
Released2025-02-052025-04-09
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1440

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 3 leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), Grok 3: 41.9 (#115)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGrok 3
Aider Polyglot35.6%53.3%
WeirdML—37.2%
LiveBench Coding63.5%—
LMArena Coding—1432

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Grok 3: 30.5 (#76)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGrok 3
BALROG—29.5%

Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), Grok 3: 13.7 (#333)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGrok 3
Epoch Capabilities Index135.06138.33
ARC-AGI-2—0%
SimpleBench—36.1%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—61.3%
ARC-AGI-1—5.5%
EnigmaEval0.7%—
LiveBench Reasoning60.1%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1434
LiveBench Data Analysis68%—
LiveBench65.1%—

Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), Grok 3: 38.0 (#145)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGrok 3
MATH Level 583.5%88.7%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—55.6%
Omni-MATH—46.4%
LiveBench Math71%—
LMArena Math—1391
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—3.8%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—0%

Knowledge Grok 3 leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), Grok 3: 46.2 (#82)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGrok 3
GPQA Diamond65.7%75.8%
Confabulations18.4%14.2%
MMLU-Pro—78.8%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.8%
GPQA (HELM)—65%
LMArena Expert—1421

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Grok 3: 52.3 (#87)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGrok 3
LMArena Non-English—1410
LMArena Chinese—1448
LMArena French—1460
LMArena German—1431
LMArena Japanese—1387
LMArena Korean—1373
LMArena Russian—1416
LMArena Spanish—1417

Instruction Following Too close to call

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), Grok 3: 75.0 (#73)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGrok 3
LiveBench Instruction Following83.4%—
IFEval—88.4%
LMArena Instruction Following—1409

Long Context Grok 3 leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), Grok 3: 38.7 (#192)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGrok 3
Fiction.LiveBench41.7%58.3%
LMArena Longer Query—1439

Writing & Preference Grok 3 leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), Grok 3: 55.8 (#141)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGrok 3
LMArena Text—1426
LMArena Creative Writing—1414
Short-Story Creative Writing—76.4%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1186
WildBench—84.9%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1425
LiveBench Language44.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Grok 3?

Gemini 2.0 Pro and Grok 3 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.1 vs 39.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Grok 3 better for coding?

Grok 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.9 versus 37.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Grok 3 share?

6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Grok 3 has 40.

Related comparisons

Go deeper