Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Grok-3 mini
Grok-3 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.0 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 1 category and Grok-3 mini in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where Grok-3 mini leads 41.0 to 29.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Fiction.LiveBench: 41.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 66.7% for Grok-3 mini.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok-3 mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 41.0 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2025-04-09 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 35 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok-3 mini leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182), Grok-3 mini: 40.4 (#126)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | 49.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 42.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1380 |
Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194), Grok-3 mini: 13.8 (#323)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | 140.35 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0.4% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 61.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 16.5% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1374 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Grok-3 mini leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101), Grok-3 mini: 40.3 (#78)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | 90.9% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 77.8% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 31.8% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1386 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 5.9% |
Knowledge Grok-3 mini leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156), Grok-3 mini: 46.3 (#75)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 76.3% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | 10.8% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 79.9% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 67.5% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1395 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Grok-3 mini: 48.3 (#141)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1352 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1387 |
| LMArena French | — | 1357 |
| LMArena German | — | 1350 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1343 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1336 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1352 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1379 |
Instruction Following Grok-3 mini leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57), Grok-3 mini: 78.7 (#8)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| IFEval | — | 95.1% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1356 |
Long Context Grok-3 mini leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287), Grok-3 mini: 41.0 (#142)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | 66.7% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1372 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164), Grok-3 mini: 52.7 (#163)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1370 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1342 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 73.5% |
| WildBench | — | 65.1% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1355 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Grok-3 mini?
Grok-3 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.0 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Grok-3 mini better for coding?
Grok-3 mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 37.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Grok-3 mini share?
6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Grok-3 mini has 35.