Model comparison

Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Grok 4 Fast

Gemini 2.0 Pro and Grok 4 Fast score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.6 vs 39.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 2.0 Pro Google

38.6

Rank #171 Confirmed

Grok 4 Fast xAI

39.0

Rank #164 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 4 categories and Grok 4 Fast in 3 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in long context, where Grok 4 Fast leads 63.2 to 29.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Fiction.LiveBench: 41.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 94.4% for Grok 4 Fast.

Side by side

Gemini 2.0 Pro and Grok 4 Fast specifications
Gemini 2.0 ProGrok 4 Fast
ProviderGooglexAI
Noometry Index38.639.0
Released2025-02-052025-09-19
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1430

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182), Grok 4 Fast: 32.3 (#264)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGrok 4 Fast
Aider Polyglot35.6%—
LMArena WebDev—1160
WeirdML—42.9%
LiveBench Coding63.5%—
LMArena Coding—1429

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Grok 4 Fast: 29.3 (#80)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGrok 4 Fast
τ²-bench Banking—15.7%
Cybench—30%
LMArena Search—1171

Reasoning Too close to call

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194), Grok 4 Fast: 22.5 (#179)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGrok 4 Fast
Epoch Capabilities Index135.06144.21
ARC-AGI-2—5.3%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—66.1%
ARC-AGI-1—48.5%
EnigmaEval0.7%—
LiveBench Reasoning60.1%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1413
DTBench—82.7%
LiveBench Data Analysis68%—
ForecastBench—60.5
LiveBench65.1%—

Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101), Grok 4 Fast: 36.1 (#126)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGrok 4 Fast
LiveBench Math71%—
LMArena Math—1419
MATH Level 583.5%—

Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156), Grok 4 Fast: 31.5 (#211)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGrok 4 Fast
GPQA Diamond65.7%—
Confabulations18.4%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate—19.7%
LMArena Expert—1411

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Grok 4 Fast: 51.5 (#106)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGrok 4 Fast
LMArena Non-English—1397
LMArena Chinese—1458
LMArena French—1433
LMArena German—1383
LMArena Japanese—1358
LMArena Korean—1359
LMArena Russian—1387
LMArena Spanish—1414

Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57), Grok 4 Fast: 73.4 (#116)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGrok 4 Fast
LiveBench Instruction Following83.4%—
LMArena Instruction Following—1388

Long Context Grok 4 Fast leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287), Grok 4 Fast: 63.2 (#3)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGrok 4 Fast
Fiction.LiveBench41.7%94.4%
LMArena Longer Query—1415

Writing & Preference Grok 4 Fast leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164), Grok 4 Fast: 60.2 (#96)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGrok 4 Fast
LMArena Text—1407
LMArena Creative Writing—1388
LMArena Multi-Turn—1414
LiveBench Language44.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Grok 4 Fast?

Gemini 2.0 Pro and Grok 4 Fast score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.6 vs 39.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Grok 4 Fast better for coding?

Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.4 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Grok 4 Fast share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4 Fast has 30.

Related comparisons

Go deeper