Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Kimi K3
Kimi K3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.5 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K3 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Kimi K3 leads 63.0 to 22.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 65.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 93.1% for Kimi K3.
- Kimi K3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Kimi K3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 59.5 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2026-07-16 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 1.05M |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $3 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $15 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 53 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K3 leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), Kimi K3: 61.0 (#10)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | — | 68.5% |
| FrontierCode | — | 44.2% |
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1654 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 25.9% |
| SciCode | — | 59.5% |
| WeirdML | — | 82.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1508 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,524 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Kimi K3: 41.8 (#20)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 50.6% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 37.1% |
| PostTrainBench | — | 32% |
| GBAEval | — | 48.3% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 19% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 5,165 |
Reasoning Kimi K3 leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), Kimi K3: 63.0 (#17)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | 157.45 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 60.4% |
| SimpleBench | — | 60.7% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 93.6% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 94.5% |
| CritPt | — | 23.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 39% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1496 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 26% |
| DTBench | — | 91.2% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| LMCA | — | 52.7% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 95% |
| ForecastBench | — | 61.1 |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Kimi K3 leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), Kimi K3: 74.2 (#16)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 72.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 39% |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 87.8% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 97.2% |
| ProofBench | — | 87% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1491 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
Knowledge Kimi K3 leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), Kimi K3: 63.2 (#21)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 93.1% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 50.6% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1521 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Kimi K3: 37.8 (#70)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 29.5% |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 34.2% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Kimi K3: 56.3 (#21)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1466 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1529 |
| LMArena French | — | 1491 |
| LMArena German | — | 1488 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1487 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1458 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1482 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1472 |
Instruction Following Kimi K3 leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), Kimi K3: 77.7 (#14)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1483 |
Long Context Kimi K3 leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), Kimi K3: 45.8 (#29)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1494 |
Writing & Preference Kimi K3 leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), Kimi K3: 76.6 (#4)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1476 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1454 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 2082 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1339 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1488 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Kimi K3?
Kimi K3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.5 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Kimi K3 better for coding?
Kimi K3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 61.0 versus 37.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Kimi K3 share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K3 has 53.