Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Magistral Small
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Google
Mistral AISummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 3 categories and Magistral Small in 1 category; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 21.6 to 6.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 65.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 56.1% for Magistral Small.
- Magistral Small has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Magistral Small | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 29.9 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2025-06-10 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 40K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.50 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182), Magistral Small: 37.8 (#172)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| SciCode | — | 35.2% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194), Magistral Small: 6.9 (#345)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | 133.19 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 6.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 5% |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 3% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| DTBench | — | 61.3% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101), Magistral Small: 24.9 (#253)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 30% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156), Magistral Small: 30.9 (#215)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 56.1% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57), Magistral Small: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287), Magistral Small: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164), Magistral Small: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Magistral Small?
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Magistral Small better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (37.4 vs 37.8); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Magistral Small share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Magistral Small has 10.