Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs MiMo-V2-Omni
MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- The widest gap is in long context, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 44.1 to 29.1.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Omni | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 42.9 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2026-03-18 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182), MiMo-V2-Omni: 42.7 (#87)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1467 |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194), MiMo-V2-Omni: 28.6 (#86)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1445 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101), MiMo-V2-Omni: 36.4 (#112)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1432 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156), MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.9 (#114)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1449 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 37.9 (#62)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1228 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 52.0 (#97)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1469 |
| LMArena French | — | 1448 |
| LMArena German | — | 1398 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1318 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1355 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1412 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1432 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57), MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.4 (#62)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1428 |
Long Context MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287), MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#72)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1442 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164), MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.6 (#83)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1424 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1393 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1446 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than MiMo-V2-Omni?
MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or MiMo-V2-Omni better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.7 versus 37.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and MiMo-V2-Omni share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Omni has 18.