Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Mistral
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
Mistral AISummary
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 75.5 to 52.6.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 29.9 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 22 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), Mistral: 33.8 (#250)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1162 |
Reasoning Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), Mistral: 22.2 (#200)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1149 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), Mistral: 22.3 (#278)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 7.2% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1180 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), Mistral: 16.6 (#288)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 27.7% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 30.3% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1125 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Mistral: 32.8 (#254)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1129 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1109 |
| LMArena French | — | 1180 |
| LMArena German | — | 1155 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1013 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1032 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1168 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1143 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), Mistral: 52.6 (#288)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| IFEval | — | 56.8% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1152 |
Long Context Mistral leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), Mistral: 35.0 (#245)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1153 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), Mistral: 37.0 (#260)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1165 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1158 |
| WildBench | — | 66% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1147 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Mistral?
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Mistral better for coding?
Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Mistral share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Mistral has 22.