Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Mistral Large 4
Mistral Large 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
Mistral AISummary
- The widest gap is in long context, where Mistral Large 4 leads 43.6 to 29.2.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral Large 4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 43.1 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2026-10-06 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 262K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.68 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.09 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Mistral Large 4 leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), Mistral Large 4: 48.6 (#57)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral Large 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1541 |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1475 |
Reasoning Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), Mistral Large 4: 22.5 (#192)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral Large 4 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 27.4% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1444 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), Mistral Large 4: 40.4 (#91)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral Large 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1488 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
Knowledge Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), Mistral Large 4: 36.6 (#166)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral Large 4 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 20% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1447 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Mistral Large 4: 52.6 (#82)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral Large 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1415 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1491 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1414 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), Mistral Large 4: 75.0 (#76)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral Large 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1424 |
Long Context Mistral Large 4 leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), Mistral Large 4: 43.6 (#89)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral Large 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1429 |
Writing & Preference Mistral Large 4 leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), Mistral Large 4: 60.4 (#97)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral Large 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1427 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1361 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1424 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Mistral Large 4?
Mistral Large 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Mistral Large 4 better for coding?
Mistral Large 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.6 versus 37.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Mistral Large 4 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Large 4 has 15.