Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs o3-pro
o3-pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.7 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 1 category and o3-pro in 4 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where o3-pro leads 72.1 to 29.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Fiction.LiveBench: 41.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 97.2% for o3-pro.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | o3-pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 42.7 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2025-06-10 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 200K |
| Max output | — | 100K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $20 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $80 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding o3-pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182), o3-pro: 55.1 (#22)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | 84.9% |
| WeirdML | — | 58.2% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
Reasoning o3-pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194), o3-pro: 24.1 (#152)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | 147.43 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 4.9% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 72.1% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 59.3% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| DTBench | — | 86.9% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| LMCA | — | 38.5% |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101), o3-pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156), o3-pro: 29.0 (#234)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Confabulations | 18.4% | 14.2% |
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 23.3% |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57), o3-pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
Long Context o3-pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287), o3-pro: 72.1 (#1)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | 97.2% |
Writing & Preference o3-pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164), o3-pro: 57.1 (#128)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 84.4% |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than o3-pro?
o3-pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.7 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or o3-pro better for coding?
o3-pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.1 versus 37.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and o3-pro share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and o3-pro has 12.