Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Qwen2-72B
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 5 categories and Qwen2-72B in 2 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 36.5 to 21.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 83.5% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 39.1% for Qwen2-72B.
- Qwen2-72B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen2-72B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 30.0 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2024-06-07 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 26 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), Qwen2-72B: 29.1 (#310)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| WeirdML | — | 11.3% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 38.5% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1196 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Qwen2-72B: 17.0 (#146)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | — | 1.1% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 29.9% |
Reasoning Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), Qwen2-72B: 23.2 (#181)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | 125.28 |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1191 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), Qwen2-72B: 30.2 (#236)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | 39.1% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1235 |
Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), Qwen2-72B: 21.2 (#275)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 40.8% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1171 |
| MMLU | — | 82.4% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Qwen2-72B: 35.9 (#244)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1176 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1240 |
| LMArena French | — | 1170 |
| LMArena German | — | 1151 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1111 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1169 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1169 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), Qwen2-72B: 61.7 (#241)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1181 |
Long Context Qwen2-72B leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), Qwen2-72B: 36.1 (#235)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1192 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), Qwen2-72B: 40.8 (#241)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1203 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1181 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1196 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Qwen2-72B?
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Qwen2-72B better for coding?
Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Qwen2-72B share?
3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2-72B has 26.