Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Gemini 2.0 Pro and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.6 vs 37.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in long context, where Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads 42.0 to 29.1.
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 37.7 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2025-04 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $7.50 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 25 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 36.2 (#199)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 55.4% |
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1275 |
| GSO | — | 4.9% |
| WeirdML | — | 41.2% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1413 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 461.45 |
| AlgoTune | — | 1.44 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 23.7 (#116)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 27.2% |
Reasoning Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 24.7 (#141)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 49.5% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1372 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 34.9 (#151)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1364 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
Knowledge Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 36.4 (#159)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1337 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 47.8 (#143)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1345 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1356 |
| LMArena French | — | 1394 |
| LMArena German | — | 1324 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1309 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1307 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1367 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1360 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 71.8 (#142)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1356 |
Long Context Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 42.0 (#126)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1379 |
Writing & Preference Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 55.5 (#142)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1356 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1333 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1365 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?
Gemini 2.0 Pro and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.6 vs 37.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct better for coding?
Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.4 versus 36.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has 25.