Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Step 2 16k Exp 202412
Gemini 2.0 Pro and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.1 vs 39.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
StepFunSummary
- The widest gap is in long context, where Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads 39.7 to 29.2.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | StepFun | |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 39.2 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 38.5 (#174)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1316 |
Reasoning Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 25.9 (#142)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1299 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 36.3 (#169)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1304 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 35.2 (#187)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1279 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 43.7 (#181)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1290 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1331 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1324 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 67.9 (#192)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1287 |
Long Context Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 39.7 (#170)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1307 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 52.3 (#173)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1321 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1328 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1292 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Step 2 16k Exp 202412?
Gemini 2.0 Pro and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.1 vs 39.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Step 2 16k Exp 202412 better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (37.8 vs 38.5); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 has 12.