Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Yi-1.5-34B
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 5 categories and Yi-1.5-34B in 2 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 36.5 to 14.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 83.5% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 25.5% for Yi-1.5-34B.
- Yi-1.5-34B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Yi-1.5-34B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | 01.AI | |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 30.6 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2024-05-13 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.4 (#272)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 33.9% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1169 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 43.8% |
Reasoning Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), Yi-1.5-34B: 22.5 (#191)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1160 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), Yi-1.5-34B: 27.5 (#249)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | 25.5% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1182 |
Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), Yi-1.5-34B: 14.8 (#295)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 32% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1144 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Yi-1.5-34B: 32.3 (#256)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1121 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1213 |
| LMArena French | — | 1156 |
| LMArena German | — | 1111 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1021 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1005 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1091 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1121 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), Yi-1.5-34B: 59.2 (#257)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1139 |
Long Context Yi-1.5-34B leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), Yi-1.5-34B: 34.6 (#248)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1143 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), Yi-1.5-34B: 37.4 (#257)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1173 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1135 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1153 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Yi-1.5-34B?
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Yi-1.5-34B better for coding?
Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 32.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Yi-1.5-34B share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Yi-1.5-34B has 21.