Model comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Grok 4.1
Grok 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 36.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite scores higher in 1 category and Grok 4.1 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where Grok 4.1 leads 43.2 to 33.3.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Grok 4.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | |
| Noometry Index | 36.4 | 40.8 |
| Released | 2025-06-17 | 2025-11-17 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.10 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.40 | — |
| Results tracked | 33 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.0 (#167), Grok 4.1: 33.4 (#246)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1373 | 1445 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1214 |
| WeirdML | 35.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 325.9 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Grok 4.1 leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 27.8 (#89), Grok 4.1: 33.8 (#47)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 36.9% | — |
| Cybench | — | 39% |
Reasoning Grok 4.1 leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 21.5 (#196), Grok 4.1: 28.3 (#91)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1377 | 1436 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 40.5% | — |
| DTBench | 62.8% | — |
| LMCA | 18.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 133.93 | — |
Math Too close to call
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 35.5 (#144), Grok 4.1: 36.2 (#124)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1373 | 1422 |
| Omni-MATH | 48% | — |
Knowledge Grok 4.1 leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 32.1 (#206), Grok 4.1: 38.9 (#129)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1373 | 1417 |
| MMLU-Pro | 53.7% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 3.3% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 30.9% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 28.6 (#109), Grok 4.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1198 | — |
| VPCT | 30% | — |
Multilingual Grok 4.1 leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 49.5 (#129), Grok 4.1: 53.6 (#64)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1369 | 1425 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1404 | 1464 |
| LMArena French | 1388 | 1448 |
| LMArena German | 1390 | 1447 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1359 | 1396 |
| LMArena Korean | 1358 | 1407 |
| LMArena Russian | 1373 | 1434 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1396 | 1438 |
Instruction Following Grok 4.1 leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 70.2 (#163), Grok 4.1: 74.0 (#106)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1366 | 1400 |
| IFEval | 81% | — |
Long Context Grok 4.1 leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 33.3 (#257), Grok 4.1: 43.2 (#96)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1373 | 1416 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 47.2% | — |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.1 leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 57.0 (#130), Grok 4.1: 62.6 (#71)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1379 | 1437 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1366 | 1411 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1367 | 1438 |
| WildBench | 81.8% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite better than Grok 4.1?
Grok 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 36.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite or Grok 4.1 better for coding?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.0 versus 33.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Grok 4.1 share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has 33 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.1 has 19.