Model comparison
Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Hy3
Gemini 2.5 Pro and Hy3 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (45.0 vs 44.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
Google
TencentSummary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Pro scores higher in 5 categories and Hy3 in 3 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where Gemini 2.5 Pro leads 59.8 to 44.1.
- Hy3 is cheaper at $0.0825 / $0.33 per million input/output tokens, against $1.25 / $10 for Gemini 2.5 Pro.
- Gemini 2.5 Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
- Hy3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.5 Pro | Hy3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | |
| Noometry Index | 45.0 | 44.2 |
| Released | 2025-03-25 | 2026-07-06 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 262K |
| Max output | 66K | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.25 | $0.0825 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | $0.33 |
| Results tracked | 78 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hy3 leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 42.4 (#101), Hy3: 46.8 (#63)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1227 | 1508 |
| LMArena Coding | 1452 | 1464 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 57.6% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 53.6% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 83.1% | — |
| SciCode | 42.8% | — |
| GSO | 3.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 54% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 85.9% | — |
| CadEval | 64% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 785.52 | — |
| AlgoTune | 1.51 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 29.2 (#88), Hy3: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 32.6% | — |
| GDPval | 23.3% | — |
| Remote Labor Index | 0.8% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | 30.3% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 13.7% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 42.8% | — |
| BALROG | 43.3% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1142 | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 55.4% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 573.64 | — |
Reasoning Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 28.8 (#99), Hy3: 26.1 (#136)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1455 | 1447 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 4.9% | — |
| SimpleBench | 62.4% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 70.3% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 41.2% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 41% | — |
| CritPt | 2% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 20% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 5.6% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 89.8% | — |
| DTBench | 82.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 79.9% | — |
| LMCA | 34.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.32 | — |
| ForecastBench | 61.3 | — |
| LiveBench | 82.3% | — |
Math Hy3 leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 32.5 (#213), Hy3: 40.1 (#93)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1450 | 1475 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 24.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 0% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 84.7% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 41.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 90.2% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 95.9% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 14.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 56.0 (#46), Hy3: 40.8 (#114)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1452 | 1460 |
| GPQA Diamond | 85.3% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 21.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 86.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 10.6% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 7% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 74.9% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 45.2 (#18), Hy3: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1263 | — |
| GeoBench | 86% | — |
| VPCT | 48% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1421 | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 44.7% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 55.3 (#31), Hy3: 53.5 (#65)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1451 | 1426 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1507 | 1493 |
| LMArena French | 1472 | 1461 |
| LMArena German | 1487 | 1439 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1461 | 1392 |
| LMArena Korean | 1434 | 1395 |
| LMArena Russian | 1461 | 1432 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | 1456 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 75.0 (#75), Hy3: 75.1 (#70)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1437 | 1426 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 80.6% | — |
| IFEval | 84% | — |
Long Context Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 59.8 (#5), Hy3: 44.1 (#75)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1449 | 1442 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 91.7% | — |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 63.7 (#62), Hy3: 62.2 (#81)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1458 | 1439 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1454 | 1402 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1453 | 1436 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 83.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1421 | — |
| WildBench | 85.7% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 67.8% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.5 Pro better than Hy3?
Gemini 2.5 Pro and Hy3 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (45.0 vs 44.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Hy3?
Hy3 is cheaper. It lists at $0.0825 per million input tokens and $0.33 per million output tokens; Gemini 2.5 Pro lists at $1.25 and $10.
Is Gemini 2.5 Pro or Hy3 better for coding?
Hy3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.8 versus 42.4 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 2.5 Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Pro and Hy3 share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Pro has 78 scored results on Noometry and Hy3 has 19.