Model comparison

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Gemini 2.5 Pro and MiMo-V2.5-Pro score almost the same on the Noometry Index (45.0 vs 45.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 24 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Google

45.0

Rank #75 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.5-Pro Xiaomi

45.2

Rank #74 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 24 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Pro scores higher in 4 categories and MiMo-V2.5-Pro in 4 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in long context, where Gemini 2.5 Pro leads 59.8 to 45.4.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 42.8% for Gemini 2.5 Pro and 50.2% for MiMo-V2.5-Pro.
  • MiMo-V2.5-Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $1.25 / $10 for Gemini 2.5 Pro.
  • MiMo-V2.5-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 2.5 Pro and MiMo-V2.5-Pro specifications
Gemini 2.5 ProMiMo-V2.5-Pro
ProviderGoogleXiaomi
Noometry Index45.045.2
Released2025-03-252026-04-22
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M1.05M
Max output66K131K
Input $ / M tokens$1.25$0.43
Output $ / M tokens$10$0.87
Results tracked7827

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 42.4 (#101), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.4 (#60)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena WebDev12271479
SciCode42.8%50.2%
LMArena Coding14521503
ALE-Bench785.52899.8
SWE-bench Verified57.6%—
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)53.6%—
Aider Polyglot83.1%—
GSO3.9%—
WeirdML54%—
LiveBench Coding85.9%—
CadEval64%—
AlgoTune1.51—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 29.2 (#88), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMiMo-V2.5-Pro
Terminal-Bench32.6%—
GDPval23.3%—
Remote Labor Index0.8%—
TheAgentCompany30.3%—
τ²-bench Banking13.7%—
DeepResearch Bench42.8%—
BALROG43.3%—
LMArena Search1142—
METR Time Horizons55.4%—
Vending-Bench 2573.64—

Reasoning Gemini 2.5 Pro leads

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 28.8 (#99), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 26.8 (#130)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMiMo-V2.5-Pro
CritPt2%4%
LMArena Hard Prompts14551488
DTBench82.4%84.5%
LMCA34.8%29.5%
ARC-AGI-24.9%—
SimpleBench62.4%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark70.3%—
NYT Connections (extended)—34.4%
ARC-AGI-141%—
Chess Puzzles20%—
EnigmaEval5.6%—
LiveBench Reasoning89.8%—
LiveBench Data Analysis79.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index145.32—
ForecastBench61.3—
LiveBench82.3%—

Math MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 32.5 (#213), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 40.0 (#96)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Math14501481
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)24.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 40%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202584.7%—
ProofBench—22%
Omni-MATH41.6%—
LiveBench Math90.2%—
MATH Level 595.9%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)14.1%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)4.2%—

Knowledge Gemini 2.5 Pro leads

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 56.0 (#46), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 42.2 (#98)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Expert14521503
GPQA Diamond85.3%—
Humanity's Last Exam21.6%—
MMLU-Pro86.3%—
Confabulations10.6%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate7%—
GPQA (HELM)74.9%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 45.2 (#18), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Vision1263—
GeoBench86%—
VPCT48%—
LMArena Document1421—
SpatialViz-Bench44.7%—

Multilingual Too close to call

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 55.3 (#31), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.1 (#34)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Non-English14511449
LMArena Chinese15071507
LMArena French14721488
LMArena German14871458
LMArena Japanese14611412
LMArena Korean14341437
LMArena Russian14611450
LMArena Spanish14731471

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 75.0 (#75), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.5 (#21)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Instruction Following14371477
LiveBench Instruction Following80.6%—
IFEval84%—

Long Context Gemini 2.5 Pro leads

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 59.8 (#5), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#37)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Longer Query14491483
Fiction.LiveBench91.7%—

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 63.7 (#62), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.3 (#49)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Text14581465
LMArena Creative Writing14541440
EQ-Bench Creative Writing14211493
LMArena Multi-Turn14531477
Short-Story Creative Writing83.8%—
WildBench85.7%—
EQ-Bench 4—1208
LiveBench Language67.8%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.5 Pro better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

Gemini 2.5 Pro and MiMo-V2.5-Pro score almost the same on the Noometry Index (45.0 vs 45.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Pro or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; Gemini 2.5 Pro lists at $1.25 and $10.

Is Gemini 2.5 Pro or MiMo-V2.5-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.4 versus 42.4 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 1.05M tokens.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Pro and MiMo-V2.5-Pro share?

24 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Pro has 78 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper