Model comparison

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Muse Spark 1.3

Muse Spark 1.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 45.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 30 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Google

45.0

Rank #75 Confirmed

Muse Spark 1.3 Meta

54.8

Rank #27 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 30 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Pro scores higher in 3 categories and Muse Spark 1.3 in 7 categories; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Muse Spark 1.3 leads 73.1 to 32.5.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3): 24.6% for Gemini 2.5 Pro and 74.4% for Muse Spark 1.3.
  • Muse Spark 1.3 is cheaper at $1.25 / $4.25 per million input/output tokens, against $1.25 / $10 for Gemini 2.5 Pro.

Side by side

Gemini 2.5 Pro and Muse Spark 1.3 specifications
Gemini 2.5 ProMuse Spark 1.3
ProviderGoogleMeta
Noometry Index45.054.8
Released2025-03-252026-09-02
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M1.05M
Max output66K131K
Input $ / M tokens$1.25$1.25
Output $ / M tokens$10$4.25
Results tracked7837

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 42.4 (#101), Muse Spark 1.3: 56.6 (#21)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena WebDev12271657
SciCode42.8%59.7%
LMArena Coding14521514
SWE-bench Verified57.6%—
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)53.6%—
Aider Polyglot83.1%—
CursorBench—41.6%
GSO3.9%—
WeirdML54%—
LiveBench Coding85.9%—
CadEval64%—
ALE-Bench785.52—
AlgoTune1.51—

Agentic & Tool Use Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 29.2 (#88), Muse Spark 1.3: 38.6 (#30)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMuse Spark 1.3
Terminal-Bench32.6%—
APEX-Agents—57.8%
GDPval23.3%—
Remote Labor Index0.8%—
TheAgentCompany30.3%—
τ²-bench Banking13.7%—
DeepResearch Bench42.8%—
BALROG43.3%—
GDP.pdf—27.6%
LMArena Search1142—
METR Time Horizons55.4%—
Vending-Bench 2573.64—

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 28.8 (#99), Muse Spark 1.3: 54.0 (#27)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMuse Spark 1.3
CritPt2%26%
Chess Puzzles20%38%
LMArena Hard Prompts14551503
DTBench82.4%96.5%
LMCA34.8%53.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index145.32156.75
ARC-AGI-24.9%—
SimpleBench62.4%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark70.3%—
NYT Connections (extended)—85.1%
ARC-AGI-141%—
EnigmaEval5.6%—
LiveBench Reasoning89.8%—
Mystery Game Puzzles—25%
LiveBench Data Analysis79.9%—
Bench to the Future 3—0.14
ForecastBench61.3—
LiveBench82.3%—

Math Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 32.5 (#213), Muse Spark 1.3: 73.1 (#21)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMuse Spark 1.3
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)24.6%74.4%
FrontierMath Tier 40%46.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202584.7%99.2%
LMArena Math14501494
ProofBench—58%
Omni-MATH41.6%—
LiveBench Math90.2%—
MATH Level 595.9%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)14.1%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)4.2%—

Knowledge Gemini 2.5 Pro leads

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 56.0 (#46), Muse Spark 1.3: 42.6 (#95)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Expert14521516
GPQA Diamond85.3%—
Humanity's Last Exam21.6%—
MMLU-Pro86.3%—
Confabulations10.6%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate7%—
GPQA (HELM)74.9%—

Multimodal Gemini 2.5 Pro leads

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 45.2 (#18), Muse Spark 1.3: 43.7 (#22)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Vision12631309
LMArena Document14211471
GeoBench86%—
VPCT48%—
SpatialViz-Bench44.7%—

Multilingual Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 55.3 (#31), Muse Spark 1.3: 57.4 (#8)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Non-English14511481
LMArena Chinese15071529
LMArena French14721524
LMArena German14871515
LMArena Japanese14611474
LMArena Korean14341501
LMArena Russian14611490
LMArena Spanish14731490

Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 75.0 (#75), Muse Spark 1.3: 77.5 (#22)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Instruction Following14371477
LiveBench Instruction Following80.6%—
IFEval84%—

Long Context Gemini 2.5 Pro leads

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 59.8 (#5), Muse Spark 1.3: 45.6 (#32)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Longer Query14491488
Fiction.LiveBench91.7%—

Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 63.7 (#62), Muse Spark 1.3: 73.6 (#9)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text14581490
LMArena Creative Writing14541455
EQ-Bench Creative Writing14211906
LMArena Multi-Turn14531482
Short-Story Creative Writing83.8%—
WildBench85.7%—
LiveBench Language67.8%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.5 Pro better than Muse Spark 1.3?

Muse Spark 1.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 45.0 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Muse Spark 1.3?

Muse Spark 1.3 is cheaper. It lists at $1.25 per million input tokens and $4.25 per million output tokens; Gemini 2.5 Pro lists at $1.25 and $10.

Is Gemini 2.5 Pro or Muse Spark 1.3 better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 56.6 versus 42.4 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 1.05M tokens.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Pro and Muse Spark 1.3 share?

30 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Pro has 78 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.3 has 37.

Related comparisons

Go deeper