Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (40.8 vs 40.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google

40.8

Rank #144 Confirmed

Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 NVIDIA

40.3

Rank #151 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite scores higher in 6 categories and Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads 60.9 to 53.1.
  • Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 is cheaper at $0.40 / $0.40 per million input/output tokens, against $0.25 / $1.50 for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite.
  • Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 131K.
  • Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 3.1 Flash LiteNvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5
ProviderGoogleNVIDIA
Noometry Index40.840.3
Released2026-03-032025-07-25
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M131K
Max output66K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.25$0.40
Output $ / M tokens$1.50$0.40
Results tracked3812

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 37.8 (#188), Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5: 39.8 (#154)

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteNvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5
LMArena Coding14001355
LMArena WebDev1256—
SciCode41.9%—
WeirdML52.2%—
ALE-Bench797.73—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 30.2 (#79), Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteNvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5
DeepResearch Bench37.3%—

Reasoning Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 22.9 (#186), Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5: 26.8 (#128)

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteNvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5
LMArena Hard Prompts14071336
Kagi LLM Benchmark67.2%—
NYT Connections (extended)8.2%—
CritPt1.1%—
Chess Puzzles25%—
EnigmaEval3%—
Thematic Generalization63.3%—
DTBench76.8%—
LMCA35%—
Epoch Capabilities Index144.47—
ForecastBench54.4—

Math Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 40.7 (#90), Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5: 38.2 (#141)

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteNvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5
LMArena Math14281392
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)27.7%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202580%—

Knowledge Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 41.9 (#104), Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5: 36.7 (#165)

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteNvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5
LMArena Expert13981330
GPQA Diamond81.8%—
Humanity's Last Exam8.6%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate8.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 39.4 (#60), Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteNvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5
LMArena Vision1240—

Multilingual Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 52.3 (#86), Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5: 45.5 (#168)

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteNvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5
LMArena Non-English14111316
LMArena Japanese14131300
LMArena Russian14201332
LMArena Chinese1461—
LMArena French1424—
LMArena German1429—
LMArena Korean1392—
LMArena Spanish1421—

Instruction Following Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 72.7 (#131), Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5: 68.6 (#188)

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteNvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5
LMArena Instruction Following13771299

Long Context Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 42.5 (#122), Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5: 40.0 (#164)

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteNvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5
LMArena Longer Query13941315

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 60.9 (#94), Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5: 53.1 (#159)

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteNvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5
LMArena Text14161338
LMArena Creative Writing14011307
LMArena Multi-Turn14171334

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite better than Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (40.8 vs 40.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5?

Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite lists at $0.25 and $1.50.

Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 better for coding?

Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.8 versus 37.8 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has 38 scored results on Noometry and Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper