Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs GLM-4.7-Flash

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.7 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index. GLM-4.7-Flash costs 31× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 21 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Google

56.7

Rank #23 Confirmed

GLM-4.7-Flash Z.ai (Zhipu)

38.8

Rank #180 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher in 8 categories and GLM-4.7-Flash in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads 71.7 to 20.9.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Chess Puzzles: 55% for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and 0% for GLM-4.7-Flash.
  • GLM-4.7-Flash is cheaper at $0.06 / $0.40 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $12 for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview.
  • Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 200K.
  • GLM-4.7-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGLM-4.7-Flash
ProviderGoogleZ.ai (Zhipu)
Noometry Index56.738.8
Released2026-02-192026-01-19
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M200K
Max output66K131K
Input $ / M tokens$2$0.06
Output $ / M tokens$12$0.40
Results tracked7121

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 42.5 (#99), GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.6 (#135)

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGLM-4.7-Flash
LMArena Coding14841383
SWE-bench Verified75.6%—
DeepSWE11.7%—
LMArena WebDev1447—
SciCode58.9%—
GSO22.6%—
WeirdML72.1%—
MirrorCode8.9%—
ALE-Bench1,161—
AlgoTune2.02—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 37.7 (#34), GLM-4.7-Flash: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGLM-4.7-Flash
Terminal-Bench80.2%—
APEX-Agents35.3%—
τ²-bench Banking26%—
DeepResearch Bench47.8%—
PostTrainBench22%—
BALROG57%—
ExploitBench26.1%—
GBAEval0.8%—
GDP.pdf17%—
LMArena Search1211—
METR Time Horizons77%—
Vending-Bench 23,774—

Reasoning Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 71.7 (#12), GLM-4.7-Flash: 20.9 (#229)

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGLM-4.7-Flash
Chess Puzzles55%0%
LMArena Hard Prompts14851356
ARC-AGI-277.1%—
SimpleBench79.6%—
NYT Connections (extended)97.4%—
ARC-AGI-198%—
CritPt17.7%—
EnigmaEval36.8%—
Thematic Generalization79.4%—
EBR-Bench14.3%—
Mystery Game Puzzles34%—
DTBench97.1%—
LMCA53.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index154.77—
ForecastBench59—

Math Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 62.1 (#34), GLM-4.7-Flash: 36.1 (#173)

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGLM-4.7-Flash
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202595.6%58.3%
LMArena Math14851355
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)59.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 426.8%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions86.5%—
ProofBench26%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)36.9%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)16.7%—

Knowledge Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 71.8 (#3), GLM-4.7-Flash: 35.5 (#184)

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGLM-4.7-Flash
GPQA Diamond94.4%60.5%
Vectara Hallucination Rate10.4%9.3%
LMArena Expert14851357
Humanity's Last Exam46.4%—
SimpleQA Verified73.5%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 37.9 (#69), GLM-4.7-Flash: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGLM-4.7-Flash
LMArena Vision1296—
Blueprint-Bench 226.5%—
Furniture Assembly26.7%—
LMArena Document1444—

Multilingual Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 57.0 (#12), GLM-4.7-Flash: 46.5 (#158)

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGLM-4.7-Flash
LMArena Non-English14771330
LMArena Chinese15291403
LMArena French14871332
LMArena German14911337
LMArena Korean14551283
LMArena Russian14981332
LMArena Spanish14791350
LMArena Japanese1493—

Instruction Following Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 77.0 (#32), GLM-4.7-Flash: 70.1 (#167)

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGLM-4.7-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following14661327

Long Context Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 47.4 (#18), GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.9 (#148)

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGLM-4.7-Flash
LMArena Longer Query14831345
CL-bench20.8%—
CL-bench Life16.9%—

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 66.1 (#37), GLM-4.7-Flash: 47.4 (#210)

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGLM-4.7-Flash
LMArena Text14811351
LMArena Creative Writing14821297
EQ-Bench Creative Writing14911125
LMArena Multi-Turn14881342
EQ-Bench 41142—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview better than GLM-4.7-Flash?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.7 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index. GLM-4.7-Flash costs 31× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or GLM-4.7-Flash?

GLM-4.7-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview lists at $2 and $12.

Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or GLM-4.7-Flash better for coding?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.5 versus 40.6 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview does, with 1.05M tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and GLM-4.7-Flash share?

21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has 71 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.7-Flash has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper