Model comparison

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Qwen3-4B

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.7 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Google

56.7

Rank #23 Confirmed

Qwen3-4B Alibaba (Qwen)

31.9

Rank #264 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen3-4B in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads 71.7 to 19.2.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Chess Puzzles: 55% for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and 4% for Qwen3-4B.
  • Qwen3-4B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Qwen3-4B specifications
Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewQwen3-4B
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index56.731.9
Released2026-02-192025-04-29
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$12—
Results tracked716

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 42.5 (#99), Qwen3-4B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewQwen3-4B
SWE-bench Verified75.6%—
DeepSWE11.7%—
LMArena WebDev1447—
SciCode58.9%—
GSO22.6%—
WeirdML72.1%—
LMArena Coding1484—
MirrorCode8.9%—
ALE-Bench1,161—
AlgoTune2.02—

Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 37.7 (#34), Qwen3-4B: 27.6 (#100)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewQwen3-4B
Terminal-Bench80.2%—
APEX-Agents35.3%—
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—35.7%
τ²-bench Banking26%—
DeepResearch Bench47.8%—
PostTrainBench22%—
BALROG57%—
ExploitBench26.1%—
GBAEval0.8%—
GDP.pdf17%—
LMArena Search1211—
METR Time Horizons77%—
Vending-Bench 23,774—

Reasoning Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 71.7 (#12), Qwen3-4B: 19.2 (#268)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewQwen3-4B
Chess Puzzles55%4%
ARC-AGI-277.1%—
SimpleBench79.6%—
NYT Connections (extended)97.4%—
ARC-AGI-198%—
CritPt17.7%—
EnigmaEval36.8%—
Thematic Generalization79.4%—
EBR-Bench14.3%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1485—
Mystery Game Puzzles34%—
DTBench97.1%—
LMCA53.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index154.77—
ForecastBench59—

Math Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 62.1 (#34), Qwen3-4B: 29.7 (#240)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewQwen3-4B
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions86.5%38.5%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202595.6%52.2%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)59.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 426.8%—
ProofBench26%—
LMArena Math1485—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)36.9%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)16.7%—

Knowledge Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 71.8 (#3), Qwen3-4B: 33.0 (#208)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewQwen3-4B
GPQA Diamond94.4%52.3%
Vectara Hallucination Rate10.4%5.7%
Humanity's Last Exam46.4%—
SimpleQA Verified73.5%—
LMArena Expert1485—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 37.9 (#69), Qwen3-4B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewQwen3-4B
LMArena Vision1296—
Blueprint-Bench 226.5%—
Furniture Assembly26.7%—
LMArena Document1444—

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 57.0 (#12), Qwen3-4B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewQwen3-4B
LMArena Non-English1477—
LMArena Chinese1529—
LMArena French1487—
LMArena German1491—
LMArena Japanese1493—
LMArena Korean1455—
LMArena Russian1498—
LMArena Spanish1479—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 77.0 (#32), Qwen3-4B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewQwen3-4B
LMArena Instruction Following1466—

Long Context Not comparable

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 47.4 (#18), Qwen3-4B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewQwen3-4B
CL-bench20.8%—
CL-bench Life16.9%—
LMArena Longer Query1483—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 66.1 (#37), Qwen3-4B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewQwen3-4B
LMArena Text1481—
LMArena Creative Writing1482—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1491—
EQ-Bench 41142—
LMArena Multi-Turn1488—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview better than Qwen3-4B?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.7 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Qwen3-4B share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has 71 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-4B has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper