Model comparison
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.8 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 26 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 26 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher in 2 categories and MiMo-V2.5-Pro in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 38.6 to 25.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 60.4% for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and 34.4% for MiMo-V2.5-Pro.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $2.50 for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 44.8 |
| Released | 2026-07-21 | 2026-04-22 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1.05M |
| Max output | 66K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.50 | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 38 | 27 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 42.1 (#96), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.0 (#58)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1440 | 1477 |
| SciCode | 41.3% | 50.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1455 | 1502 |
| ALE-Bench | 765.27 | 899.8 |
| WeirdML | 39% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 28.6 (#82), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GDP.pdf | 10% | — |
Reasoning Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 27.8 (#95), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 25.9 (#124)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 60.4% | 34.4% |
| CritPt | 0% | 4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1441 | 1487 |
| DTBench | 83.5% | 84.5% |
| LMCA | 37.6% | 29.5% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 10.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 53.5% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 22% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 19% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.12 | — |
Math MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.7 (#245), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 38.6 (#84)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 13% | 22% |
| LMArena Math | 1431 | 1480 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 26% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 0% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 71.1% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 50.0 (#66), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 41.5 (#100)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1430 | 1501 |
| GPQA Diamond | 83.3% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 40.3 (#38), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1266 | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 53.8 (#59), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.3 (#33)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1428 | 1449 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1467 | 1507 |
| LMArena French | 1452 | 1489 |
| LMArena German | 1454 | 1455 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1428 | 1418 |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | 1436 |
| LMArena Russian | 1443 | 1450 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1440 | 1470 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 75.0 (#77), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.6 (#21)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | 1477 |
Long Context MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 43.8 (#80), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#38)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1435 | 1482 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 64.4 (#55), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.5 (#47)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1436 | 1465 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1419 | 1440 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1559 | 1493 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | 1477 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1208 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.8 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite lists at $0.30 and $2.50.
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or MiMo-V2.5-Pro better for coding?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.0 versus 42.1 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Both accept 1.05M tokens.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and MiMo-V2.5-Pro share?
26 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has 38 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27.